TRON.dll User
Posts: 4,349 | RE: Why does the world hate TRON Legacy? on Monday, July, 04, 2011 5:43 PM
Theflynnabides Wrote:Also, I'm getting tired of hearing "WE NEVER FOUND OUT WHY QUORRA WAS SO SPESHAL"
SHE'S AN INDEPENDENTLY THINKING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE THAT CREATED ITSELF, HOW WOULD THAT NOT ABSOLUTELY REVOLUTIONIZE EVERYTHING |
The reason people don't know that she's an independently thinking AI that created itself is because that fact was never enforced throughout the movie. It was explicitly stated like once, but it really kind of depended on the viewer having read the graphic novel beforehand.
TRON 2.0 (PC) name - TRON.dll
I'll play any mode, but I'm best at LC.
PSN - TRON-dll
XBOX Live/Games for Windows Live - TRONdll
-I have a Wii, DS, and 3DS. PM me to exchange friend codes. |
Argent User
Posts: 274 | RE: Why does the world hate TRON Legacy? on Monday, July, 04, 2011 6:46 PM
Theflynnabides Wrote:EDIT: Also, I'm getting tired of hearing "WE NEVER FOUND OUT WHY QUORRA WAS SO SPESHAL"
SHE'S AN INDEPENDENTLY THINKING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE THAT CREATED ITSELF, HOW WOULD THAT NOT ABSOLUTELY REVOLUTIONIZE EVERYTHING |
As a spontaneously-generated AI, Quorra would be of immense interest to scholars. AI researchers would be lining up around the block for a chance to study her, and the spontaneous formation of the ISOs would spark some intense philosophical debates. But in practical terms, how would her existence revolutionize anything? How would it change life for the average man on the street? When I look out the window at a world where ISOs exist, how is it different from our own?
ISOs are sentient, free-willed AIs. That makes them our potential partners, not tools. That sounds amazing at first blush, but I don't think humanity as a whole wants that, at least not from their computers. Does the average person want to deal with software that has its own personality and interests, and may disobey commands that it disagrees with? Programs that need to be persuaded or incentivized to carry out tasks, and may demand better working conditions or other concessions? Even if we were to learn to duplicate the ISOs themselves, or deliberately replicate the conditions from which they sprang, there's not a lot of incentive to do so - we want software that follows our commands, and manufacturing and selling ISOs would be akin to cloning humans to sell them as slaves.
And then there's the fact that the ISOs would be our first real encounter with non-human sentience. The thought of sentient life arising from our computer networks is fascinating. The problem is that they're in our computer networks. Any extraterrestrials we encounter will be separated from Earth by lightyears of space, going about their day to day lives on a world safely distant from our own. ISOs, spontaneously-generated AI's we don't completely understand and can't control, would be residing here, in our networks, alongside the programs and data we rely on to keep civilization running. How well do you think that would go over? We'd be lucky if we didn't see Clu's poisoning of the Sea of Simulation carried out on a global scale, as governments and corporations scramble to ensure nothing like the ISOs ever arises to threaten their control of our computer networks.
So looking at them strictly as spontaneously-generated sentient AI's, Quorra and the ISOs would probably be seen as scientific curiosities at best and security threats to be ruthlessly suppressed at worst. If there is more to them than that, something that makes them a genuine civilization-wide game-changer, the screenplay didn't do a good job of conveying it. I'd be interested in hearing your thoughts on exactly how they would change everything.
|
Pilgrim1099 User
Posts: 606 | RE: Why does the world hate TRON Legacy? on Monday, July, 04, 2011 7:17 PM
Argent Wrote:
If there is more to them than that, something that makes them a genuine civilization-wide game-changer, the screenplay didn't do a good job of conveying it. I'd be interested in hearing your thoughts on exactly how they would change everything. |
THIS is why the LOST writers screwed up on. I think they were pretending to be Tron fans but never truly understood the mythos behind it. And they tried to pull a "George Lucas" with the ISOs. The odd thing is that the comic explained the ISOs differently than the film version. |
Theflynnabides User
Posts: 215 | RE: Why does the world hate TRON Legacy? on Monday, July, 04, 2011 8:32 PM
TRON.dll Wrote:Theflynnabides Wrote:Also, I'm getting tired of hearing "WE NEVER FOUND OUT WHY QUORRA WAS SO SPESHAL"
SHE'S AN INDEPENDENTLY THINKING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE THAT CREATED ITSELF, HOW WOULD THAT NOT ABSOLUTELY REVOLUTIONIZE EVERYTHING |
The reason people don't know that she's an independently thinking AI that created itself is because that fact was never enforced throughout the movie. It was explicitly stated like once, but it really kind of depended on the viewer having read the graphic novel beforehand. |
Not at all, My friend understood the film perfectly, that's because we were paying attention ____________________________________
"Tron is for NERDS!"
Yea, well, that's just like, your opinion, man...
|
Argent User
Posts: 274 | RE: Why does the world hate TRON Legacy? on Monday, July, 04, 2011 9:26 PM
Pilgrim1099 Wrote:Argent Wrote:
If there is more to them than that, something that makes them a genuine civilization-wide game-changer, the screenplay didn't do a good job of conveying it. I'd be interested in hearing your thoughts on exactly how they would change everything. |
THIS is why the LOST writers screwed up on. I think they were pretending to be Tron fans but never truly understood the mythos behind it. And they tried to pull a "George Lucas" with the ISOs. The odd thing is that the comic explained the ISOs differently than the film version. |
The thing that kills me is, like Mulder, I want to believe. I just kept thinking, "Come on, guys, give me something. I'm willing to meet you halfway." Flynn seemed to feel the ISOs were more important to humanity than the Grid itself.
Think about that for a minute.
The Grid, a miracle box capable of housing entire cities and supporting millions of people in a couple of servers in an arcade somewhere. A place where aging is slowed by a factor of 50. A possible solution to humanity's overcrowding problems, and an amazing simulator with the potential to spawn scientific and technological advances that could carry over to the real world.
And the ISOs are supposed to be more important than all of that.
After a build-up like that, is it any wonder that people were let down by the vague hand-waving when it came time to explain exactly what it was about them that would change everything, and how?
I think it would have worked if they'd come at it from another angle.
Imagine:
Kevin Flynn
Think about it. Artificial intelligence - artificial life, man! - arising spontaneously out of the information moving through our computers! Quorra's the proof! And if it happened once, it could happen again - could be happening, right now - somewhere out there. When it does, those programs - those people - are going to need protection. People in our world won't want to believe. But when they see Quorra, they'll have to.
|
Now if they had dropped something like that into the script, I would have been content. Flynn thinks something like the ISOs can spring into being elsewhere, and knowing how people in the real world can be, he wants Sam and Quorra to lay the groundwork so that our eventual first contact with them doesn't end in tragedy? I'm totally good with that. It fits with Flynn's feelings of guilt over Clu and the ISO massacre, and it would explain why he's so determined to see Quorra safe, over and above any feelings he has for her as a person.
The problem is, they didn't. You can't even read this in from between the lines, because there's nothing between the lines to read. On this particular point, the screenplay falls flat. And given the importance of said point, that's a real problem. where to buy abortion pill abortion types buy abortion pill online
|
Kat User
Posts: 2,394 | RE: Why does the world hate TRON Legacy? on Monday, July, 04, 2011 11:47 PM
Argent Wrote:Theflynnabides Wrote:EDIT: Also, I'm getting tired of hearing "WE NEVER FOUND OUT WHY QUORRA WAS SO SPESHAL"
SHE'S AN INDEPENDENTLY THINKING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE THAT CREATED ITSELF, HOW WOULD THAT NOT ABSOLUTELY REVOLUTIONIZE EVERYTHING |
As a spontaneously-generated AI, Quorra would be of immense interest to scholars. AI researchers would be lining up around the block for a chance to study her, and the spontaneous formation of the ISOs would spark some intense philosophical debates. But in practical terms, how would her existence revolutionize anything? How would it change life for the average man on the street? When I look out the window at a world where ISOs exist, how is it different from our own?
ISOs are sentient, free-willed AIs. That makes them our potential partners, not tools. That sounds amazing at first blush, but I don't think humanity as a whole wants that, at least not from their computers. Does the average person want to deal with software that has its own personality and interests, and may disobey commands that it disagrees with? Programs that need to be persuaded or incentivized to carry out tasks, and may demand better working conditions or other concessions? Even if we were to learn to duplicate the ISOs themselves, or deliberately replicate the conditions from which they sprang, there's not a lot of incentive to do so - we want software that follows our commands, and manufacturing and selling ISOs would be akin to cloning humans to sell them as slaves.
And then there's the fact that the ISOs would be our first real encounter with non-human sentience. The thought of sentient life arising from our computer networks is fascinating. The problem is that they're in our computer networks. Any extraterrestrials we encounter will be separated from Earth by lightyears of space, going about their day to day lives on a world safely distant from our own. ISOs, spontaneously-generated AI's we don't completely understand and can't control, would be residing here, in our networks, alongside the programs and data we rely on to keep civilization running. How well do you think that would go over? We'd be lucky if we didn't see Clu's poisoning of the Sea of Simulation carried out on a global scale, as governments and corporations scramble to ensure nothing like the ISOs ever arises to threaten their control of our computer networks.
So looking at them strictly as spontaneously-generated sentient AI's, Quorra and the ISOs would probably be seen as scientific curiosities at best and security threats to be ruthlessly suppressed at worst. If there is more to them than that, something that makes them a genuine civilization-wide game-changer, the screenplay didn't do a good job of conveying it. I'd be interested in hearing your thoughts on exactly how they would change everything. |
Right, what I was thinking. It seems to me Flynn's excited about more than just "wow, they're AI!" I mean, that's "cool," but I don't see either how it changes the world.
I've always wondered... from the other side of the screen, what would an ISO look like? I mean, would a user look at one and say, "where'd this program come from? It doesn't seem to do anything. What is it, spyware?" and delete it? (So really, from that standpoint, what Clu did doesn't seem that bad, right? Because from an outside perspective, that's probably exactly what a user would want. Random programs popping up on your machine for no reason that seem to serve no purpose? Uh, no.)
Argent Wrote:Imagine:
Kevin Flynn
Think about it. Artificial intelligence - artificial life, man! - arising spontaneously out of the information moving through our computers! Quorra's the proof! And if it happened once, it could happen again - could be happening, right now - somewhere out there. When it does, those programs - those people - are going to need protection. People in our world won't want to believe. But when they see Quorra, they'll have to.
|
Now if they had dropped something like that into the script, I would have been content. Flynn thinks something like the ISOs can spring into being elsewhere, and knowing how people in the real world can be, he wants Sam and Quorra to lay the groundwork so that our eventual first contact with them doesn't end in tragedy? I'm totally good with that. It fits with Flynn's feelings of guilt over Clu and the ISO massacre, and it would explain why he's so determined to see Quorra safe, over and above any feelings he has for her as a person.
The problem is, they didn't. You can't even read this in from between the lines, because there's nothing between the lines to read. On this particular point, the screenplay falls flat. And given the importance of said point, that's a real problem. |
Although. I still don't know that's a good thing. Why are humanity and ISOs going to meet up (unless you mean within a computer environment, in which case I'm sure even Quorra won't stop us from going in guns blazing and taking over rather than working in harmony with whoever already lives there; humanity is too stuck on a manifest-destiny mindset to ever do otherwise, I think--what's that Ray Bradbury book about Mars?)? What would bringing them to our world accomplish, except to add more individuals to an already-overpopulated planet? They'd still have to be capable of something pretty damn special to justify bringing them over...
What do you want? I'm busy.
Program, please!
Chaos.... good news. |
Argent User
Posts: 274 | RE: Why does the world hate TRON Legacy? on Tuesday, July, 05, 2011 12:34 AM
Kat Wrote:Right, what I was thinking. It seems to me Flynn's excited about more than just "wow, they're AI!" I mean, that's "cool," but I don't see either how it changes the world.
I've always wondered... from the other side of the screen, what would an ISO look like? I mean, would a user look at one and say, "where'd this program come from? It doesn't seem to do anything. What is it, spyware?" and delete it? (So really, from that standpoint, what Clu did doesn't seem that bad, right? Because from an outside perspective, that's probably exactly what a user would want. Random programs popping up on your machine for no reason that seem to serve no purpose? Uh, no.) |
Yeah, that's pretty much what I was thinking. When programs with strange filenames start turning up on someone's hard drive, using memory and CPU cycles and serving no real purpose you can see, I think "malware", and my first reaction is to say, "Better get rid of that."
Kat Wrote:Although. I still don't know that's a good thing. Why are humanity and ISOs going to meet up (unless you mean within a computer environment, in which case I'm sure even Quorra won't stop us from going in guns blazing and taking over rather than working in harmony with whoever already lives there; humanity is too stuck on a manifest-destiny mindset to ever do otherwise, I think--what's that Ray Bradbury book about Mars?)? What would bringing them to our world accomplish, except to add more individuals to an already-overpopulated planet? They'd still have to be capable of something pretty damn special to justify bringing them over... |
Yeah, I was thinking that something ISO-like might eventually arise in another computer system somewhere, not in the real world. When that happens, you'd want someone out there who could recognize them for what they are instead of saying, "Hey, this system's filled with malware - I'd better reformat the HD and reinstall the OS."
In that scenario, Flynn telling Sam to take Quorra with him wouldn't have been so much to get her out into the real world so much as to make sure she would survive, period. Being at ground zero when Flynn reintegrated with Clu might well have destroyed her - it certainly did a job on the area surrounding the portal.
Admittedly, I'm reaching with all this. The problem for me is that characters who are positioned as "special" or "chosen ones" with some nebulously-defined "power to change the world" almost always descend into cheese. Usually they end up getting trotted out at the climax of a movie or series, where their poorly-explained superpower manifests in a blinding display of deus ex machina to save the day. And I like Quorra too much for that. She's a strong, sexy female character with a great personality. By pushing the whole "she'll change the world because she's SUPAR SPESHUL" angle, they've written her into that "deus ex machina gimmick character" box, with all the baggage that comes with it. Now whoever's responsible for the sequel is stuck with the unenviable task of dealing with that. The character deserves better, IMO. So yeah, I'm casting about for some kind of workaround, something that would explain her importance to the audience's satisfaction without entering the realm of the utterly lame. (I definitely don't want it to be one of these cases where she has some quasi-mystical power to talk with and control digital devices in the real world or something "because she's digital!", and that's exactly the kind of thing I'm afraid we may end up with. : / )
(Maybe we ought to take this discussion over to the sequel ideas thread?)
|
DarthMeow504 User
Posts: 134 | RE: Why does the world hate TRON Legacy? on Tuesday, July, 05, 2011 2:59 AM
AriesT Wrote:Vaporware Wrote:I think people expected another "Matrix" with all the kung-fu and superficial philosophy.
| And I hated the philosophy part because it did not make much sense in part 2 and 3 and it was way to confusing. Beside, I hate Matrix 3. Ruined the myth of the first film which I never saw again since 2005, though Matrix 1 is a timeless masterpiece.
|
I really hate seeing sci fi fans, especially those who also like TRON, say things like that. Ok, I expect the average joe not to understand the films, they're deep and complex and the Wachowskis didn't spoonfeed you the answers --though everything was there for you to put it together for yourself.
I could probably derail the thread easily with a long explanation of how the sequels worked and how so many of the interpretations out there are wrong, but I'll try not to do that. Instead, I'll just say that the Matrix sequels DID make sense and wrapped up the story brilliantly. If you get it, if you understand what you're seeing, it's amazing. And it's practically geek porn for programmers, hackers, and cyberpunk fans.
I strongly suggest watching them again, along with the Animatrix, and really attempt to puzzle out and follow what's going on. It's all there, and it fits together flawlessly. When you get it, you'll be amazed.
Here's a hint: There is NO magic, no mystical explanation for anything. Nor are they inside a nested "Matrix within a Matrix". The real world scenes happen in the real world, and everything can be explained in sci fi computer / electronic terms. What happens in the end is completely predicted by the statements given earlier.
Another hint: Every single Matrix-equipped human is a cyborg. Every one of them has electronic equipment built into them. And they have software as well as hardware.
Final hint: Wi-fi. He has it.
Happy hunting.
abortion pills online http://www.kvicksundscupen.se/template/default.aspx?abortion-questions cytotec abortion
|
Argent User
Posts: 274 | RE: Why does the world hate TRON Legacy? on Tuesday, July, 05, 2011 3:53 AM
DarthMeow504 Wrote:Here's a hint: There is NO magic, no mystical explanation for anything. |
Just as an FYI: Since your post came on the heels of me explaining how much I dislike "chosen one" characters with poorly-defined, quasi-mystical superpowers, I just thought I'd throw in that Neo wasn't one of the characters I had in mind when I was writing that. : ) (The character who exemplifies that for me is actually Elizabeth, aka "Elizardbeth", the half-alien hybrid from the original V series, if you've ever seen it.)
order abortion pill http://unclejohnsprojects.com/template/default.aspx?morning-after-pill-price where to buy abortion pill
|
DarthMeow504 User
Posts: 134 | RE: Why does the world hate TRON Legacy? on Tuesday, July, 05, 2011 4:06 AM
Argent Wrote:DarthMeow504 Wrote:Here's a hint: There is NO magic, no mystical explanation for anything. |
Just as an FYI: Since your post came on the heels of me explaining how much I dislike "chosen one" characters with poorly-defined, quasi-mystical superpowers, I just thought I'd throw in that Neo wasn't one of the characters I had in mind when I was writing that. : ) (The character who exemplifies that for me is actually Elizabeth, aka "Elizardbeth", the half-alien hybrid from the original V series, if you've ever seen it.)
|
I remember it quite well... that was a completely cheeseball moment in what was up to that point a solid sci fi show. As I recall, she never manifested that ability again in the episodic series, it was a one time thing. Nor was it ever part of the original story, in the novelization it happens differently. Instead of a mysterious glow, she instead decodes the password to deactivate the self-destruct. It's an almost autistic level display of mathematical prodigy, but it's not the "hi-pro glow" bullshit that they shat onto the screen. I honestly think some idiot producer decided that her decoding the passcode wasn't dramatic or exciting enough and so they forced that glow stupidity instead.
As far as I'm concerned, the way it happened in the novel is canon.
|
Kat User
Posts: 2,394 | RE: Why does the world hate TRON Legacy? on Tuesday, July, 05, 2011 6:56 AM
Argent Wrote:Kat Wrote:Right, what I was thinking. It seems to me Flynn's excited about more than just "wow, they're AI!" I mean, that's "cool," but I don't see either how it changes the world.
I've always wondered... from the other side of the screen, what would an ISO look like? I mean, would a user look at one and say, "where'd this program come from? It doesn't seem to do anything. What is it, spyware?" and delete it? (So really, from that standpoint, what Clu did doesn't seem that bad, right? Because from an outside perspective, that's probably exactly what a user would want. Random programs popping up on your machine for no reason that seem to serve no purpose? Uh, no.) |
Yeah, that's pretty much what I was thinking. When programs with strange filenames start turning up on someone's hard drive, using memory and CPU cycles and serving no real purpose you can see, I think "malware", and my first reaction is to say, "Better get rid of that."
|
Y'know, that's what I've always wondered. If you've been "in there," then you know programs are like people... you'd probably never run AdAware again, never delete an unneeded program, never reinstall, etc. Your machine would get so bogged down it's not even funny... especially if you throw thousands/millions/however many ISOs in to the mix! It'd sort of be a nightmare.
And of course like you said, security problems galore because it'd be a hacker's dream: "here's a weird exe file. Well, but it might be an ISO, better not delete it! Gee, where'd my bank info go?"
Argent Wrote:Yeah, I was thinking that something ISO-like might eventually arise in another computer system somewhere, not in the real world. When that happens, you'd want someone out there who could recognize them for what they are instead of saying, "Hey, this system's filled with malware - I'd better reformat the HD and reinstall the OS."
In that scenario, Flynn telling Sam to take Quorra with him wouldn't have been so much to get her out into the real world so much as to make sure she would survive, period. Being at ground zero when Flynn reintegrated with Clu might well have destroyed her - it certainly did a job on the area surrounding the portal.
Admittedly, I'm reaching with all this. The problem for me is that characters who are positioned as "special" or "chosen ones" with some nebulously-defined "power to change the world" almost always descend into cheese. Usually they end up getting trotted out at the climax of a movie or series, where their poorly-explained superpower manifests in a blinding display of deus ex machina to save the day. And I like Quorra too much for that. She's a strong, sexy female character with a great personality. By pushing the whole "she'll change the world because she's SUPAR SPESHUL" angle, they've written her into that "deus ex machina gimmick character" box, with all the baggage that comes with it. Now whoever's responsible for the sequel is stuck with the unenviable task of dealing with that. The character deserves better, IMO. So yeah, I'm casting about for some kind of workaround, something that would explain her importance to the audience's satisfaction without entering the realm of the utterly lame. (I definitely don't want it to be one of these cases where she has some quasi-mystical power to talk with and control digital devices in the real world or something "because she's digital!", and that's exactly the kind of thing I'm afraid we may end up with. : / )
(Maybe we ought to take this discussion over to the sequel ideas thread?) |
I never was sure that Sam taking Q to the real world WASN'T just about saving her life... if it hadn't been for Clu's intervention, if he'd been eliminated as a threat, I dunno if she would've gone along with the Flynns or not, or that they wouldn't have taken her only so as not to leave her behind. Would be interesting to get the writers' take on that.
I do think she could've stood on her own "I am cool and kick ass" merits. And I think it could've worked just fine to just let it rest on the "dude, they totally just spontaneously came about, now that is cool" premise, and making it a "Sam and Quorra are going to change the world by continuing his dad's work" (which would be what, some sort of digital Peace Corps?) rather than making it sound like something more. But I agree with you that trying to make it more was a bit over the top. Especially since the ISOs are supposedly so automatically wise and stuff, but Quorra seems pretty normal. She can whoop ass, but she spends at least part of the movie deferring to Flynn's "wisdom" as she says, and never does display any of her own, unless you want to count the somewhat-disputed (and IMO, impulsive; she and Sam are two peas in a pod) distraction of Rinzler. I mean, even after helping Sam defy his dad and get to the city to find Zuse, she still is surprised when Flynn goes after him.
order abortion pill abortion pill buy online where to buy abortion pill What do you want? I'm busy.
Program, please!
Chaos.... good news. |
DarthMeow504 User
Posts: 134 | RE: Why does the world hate TRON Legacy? on Tuesday, July, 05, 2011 7:18 AM
The only thing I can think of as far as the special application of the ISOs would be the "digital DNA" angle. I do believe there's a line about making disease a "thing of the past", which can make some sense if the ISOs are like a cross between programs and humans as it appears they are. Meaning, you can't turn a human into a program and edit away their ills with a few lines of code, but it might be possible to upgrade human DNA to ISO-style "digital DNA" and then repair them just as Flynn did to Quorra when she was injured. Such a thing could truly revolutionize human existence, not only allowing repair but also upgrades and customization. Don't like your hair color? Wish you were taller? The opposite gender? All a few simple mod patch installs away. This would be a pretty big deal.
However, the Grid and the Shiva laser itself is even bigger. All of humanity's resource problems are made obsolete. Unlimited energy, instant construction of anything you can program in a design for, teleportation-type travel and shipping. Even waste disposal. The Shiva laser alone is enough to bring mankind from our current level of technology to near Star Trek levels virtually overnight. And that's without involving the Grid itself and it's astonishing possibilities.
When Flynn said "I'd give this all up for you" to Sam, that actually pissed me off. This supposed genius is sitting on the single biggest breakthrough in human history, which can change and improve the lives of billions, and he would throw it away? How astonishingly selfish and short-sighted. Such an amazing gift to the world is more important than any one person, no matter how beloved. Needs of the many...order abortion pill abortion pill buy online where to buy abortion pill
|
IluthraDanar User
Posts: 1,178 | RE: Why does the world hate TRON Legacy? on Tuesday, July, 05, 2011 12:59 PM
@darthmeow but in that moment, he was speaking as a father, not a scientist. Being human, he is allowed to feel that way, having been separated from his son for so long. Anything else would have made him a man of stone.order abortion pill abortion pill buy online where to buy abortion pillwhere to buy abortion pill ordering abortion pills to be shipped to house buy abortion pill online
Forget it, Mr High and Mighty Master Control. You aren't making me talk.
|
Darth Tronage User
Posts: 253 | RE: Why does the world hate TRON Legacy? on Tuesday, July, 05, 2011 2:47 PM
Wow, I never realized how much money PotC made this last round. And the newest Transformers movie made in one weekend nearly what Tron Legacy made over it's entire theatrical run! Amazing.
I don't believe the general audience lacks intelligence or is mentally lazy. I just think that most people go to the movies to escape reality and to go on a cheap adventure driven vacation. Most people work jobs that require using their head all week long and want to mentally unwind when being entertained. They want to escape their mundane lives and not have to see a movie multiple times to understand it. I don't mind movies that require me to do a lot of thinking but most people I know, just want a clear straightforward movie plot. If they want something complex they will buy a book.
The problem with symbolism is it can be understood differently from what the writers and directors intended. By the end of the movie, it should be very clear what everything represented and what the message of the movie was. Otherwise, if it's not action packed or very humorous (Micheal Bay, Jim Carey), the audience walks away bored and/or confused, leading to disappointment. And an intelligent movie with a deep message can be made without being shrouded in complete symbolism and fragmented clues sprinkled randomly throughout the story. Just look at all the different meanings people drew from Legacy. Some in conflict with others. The movie wasn't clear as to it's message and what was the exact significance of all the elements. That doesn't seem like very good story telling. I like it when movie writers are very bold and clear about their message. Not so much when they try to hide it in symbolism so only others who think like them get it.order abortion pill http://unclejohnsprojects.com/template/default.aspx?morning-after-pill-price where to buy abortion pillabortion pills online abortion pill online purchase cytotec abortion
Jet Lives! |
AriesT User
Posts: 171 | RE: Why does the world hate TRON Legacy? on Tuesday, July, 05, 2011 2:56 PM
On the other hand, look at Inception. This movie was highly complex with its 5 levels of storytelling. However, most people understood this movie and it was a great success. At least my friends and me understood it entirely and we all had the same opinion this was the best film of 2010 (Legacy started in January). Beside some stupid Avatar kids who mourned at the IMDB forums Inception is shit because they did not understand it and it had plotholes (it has none). Though everything is explained and completed in the film if you pay attention.
The outstanding success of PotC 4 could be a bad, a very bad sign for TR3N.
Disney is not going to put 150 millions into a highly detailed and rather complex movie again which only grosses 400 million if they can spend 200 million on some random PotC sequel with a mediocre story and making 1 billion.
|
Darth Tronage User
Posts: 253 | RE: Why does the world hate TRON Legacy? on Tuesday, July, 05, 2011 2:59 PM
I agree, Inception was great. But it was clear about what was going on and the concept.where to buy abortion pill ordering abortion pills to be shipped to house buy abortion pill online
Jet Lives! |
DarthMeow504 User
Posts: 134 | RE: Why does the world hate TRON Legacy? on Tuesday, July, 05, 2011 4:42 PM
Darth Tronage Wrote:I don't believe the general audience lacks intelligence or is mentally lazy. I just think that most people go to the movies to escape reality and to go on a cheap adventure driven vacation. Most people work jobs that require using their head all week long and want to mentally unwind when being entertained. They want to escape their mundane lives and not have to see a movie multiple times to understand it. I don't mind movies that require me to do a lot of thinking but most people I know, just want a clear straightforward movie plot. If they want something complex they will buy a book. |
I think you rather overestimate the american audience, which tends to in fact be dumb and anti-intellectual as a whole. That's a large part of why T:L did better with overseas audiences.
However, you hit on a point that many seem to overlook or want to deny, which is the fact that Legacy wasn't escapist enough. In many ways, it was in fact anti-escapist.
TRON showed us a different world, a beautiful world of light and color and digital smoothness, a place almost too perfect to be real, a place where the ordinary limitations of the physical world do not apply. A world where giant structures or powerful equipment can just be summoned or vanished in mere moments. A world where limitations of space, resources, materials, and most other physical constraints are no more. A place where if you imagine it, then engineer it, it becomes real. We hate the MCP naturally, because we're shown this world of limitless possibility, a dream come true, and it's turning it into a nightmare. Imposing restrictions and limitations on what could be free and limitless. We as the audience not only want to see that world freed to embrace it's potential, we want to go there. We want to leave our dreary, dull world behind and go to the other world where everything is beautiful and anything is possible. When the credits roll, we want more. And are willing to watch it again just to immerse ourselves in that world.
Legacy treats it's Grid with contempt. Even by it's creator it's viewed as a prison and a waste of time, a distraction from what the film judges important which is time with his son. The message is "don't pursue your dreams, that's silly and childish, focus on your family and regular life". It's a "stop dreaming and get responsible" message, akin to "get a haircut and get a real job". Except given the amazing possibilities of the Grid, it's basically like telling the next Jimi Hendrix to put down the guitar and go to law school instead. It's a completely anti-escapist message, and that's why it was so disappointing even to fans who otherwise liked the film.
The design and plot decisions all reinforced the basic "forget the Grid and focus on the real world" message. The Grid was only there to be escaped from, and at no point did the film ever do anything to portray a more positive side to the Grid. Even in Flynn's home, or the outlands outside the control of Clu, it remained stark and barren with no hint of the wondrous beauty of the first film. Everything was done to make the Grid as dreary and unlikable as possible, even down to making it rain. Why in the name of fuck would it need to rain in a digital simulation? What purpose does it serve? And why wouldn't Clu edit that out right away as one of those imperfections he was so intent on destroying? For that matter, why would there be alleyways with garbage or homeless bum programs? Again, something that would have quickly been eliminated by perfection-driven Clu and only existed to make the Grid seem like a nasty, unpleasant place.
And to nail it home, they diss the Grid and Shiva system as yesterday's news to focus the "hope" angle on the ISOs, which were never adequately explained or demonstrated in any way to be anywhere close to the potential of the Grid. But regardless of what we are thinking and feeling ("wait, a whole world inside a computer box? An entire completely customizable city with unlimited resources in a single outdated server? Holy shit wow!") we're told to forget all that and concentrate on the vaguely-defined ISOs instead. We're told to care about them without ever being given good reason to.
Avatar, for all it's hatred from some fans, worked because it built a compelling alternate world the audience wanted to be part of --and it allowed it's plot to reinforce that feeling. People wanted to go and live on Pandora. People wanted to be part of that amazing, beautiful world and they cheered for those that were fighting for it. They went to see it again and again because they wanted to immerse themselves in that world. Whatever the plot might have lacked (and yeah, it was pretty paint by numbers stuff) didn't matter in the face of that beautifully rendered and compelling setting. A deeper or more complex plot would have only gotten in the way, Pandora was why people loved Avatar.
TRON was that way, too. It's not as if the original film had a very deep or complex plot either, really the story is rather lean and straightforward, much like that of Legacy. But that didn't matter to the audiences who fell in love with it. What mattered was the amazing world that was put on display for us. A world which left us wishing we could go there. An escapist dream of a better place.
In the midst of an economic grind, with the shallowest cultural landscape in living memory, an escapist vision would have sold. But Legacy was focused on escaping the world it created to get back to the crapsack real world. That was a message no one wanted, not fans nor regular audiences. And that's why, despite everything else it had going for it, Legacy was a disappointment bordering on failure.
Give us a truly escapist TRON film in the spirit of the original, and it will be a hit.
|
Kat User
Posts: 2,394 | RE: Why does the world hate TRON Legacy? on Tuesday, July, 05, 2011 7:25 PM
DarthMeow504 Wrote:
TRON showed us a different world, a beautiful world of light and color and digital smoothness, a place almost too perfect to be real, a place where the ordinary limitations of the physical world do not apply. A world where giant structures or powerful equipment can just be summoned or vanished in mere moments. A world where limitations of space, resources, materials, and most other physical constraints are no more. A place where if you imagine it, then engineer it, it becomes real. We hate the MCP naturally, because we're shown this world of limitless possibility, a dream come true, and it's turning it into a nightmare. Imposing restrictions and limitations on what could be free and limitless. We as the audience not only want to see that world freed to embrace it's potential, we want to go there. We want to leave our dreary, dull world behind and go to the other world where everything is beautiful and anything is possible. When the credits roll, we want more. And are willing to watch it again just to immerse ourselves in that world.
Legacy treats it's Grid with contempt. Even by it's creator it's viewed as a prison and a waste of time, a distraction from what the film judges important which is time with his son. The message is "don't pursue your dreams, that's silly and childish, focus on your family and regular life". It's a "stop dreaming and get responsible" message, akin to "get a haircut and get a real job". Except given the amazing possibilities of the Grid, it's basically like telling the next Jimi Hendrix to put down the guitar and go to law school instead. It's a completely anti-escapist message, and that's why it was so disappointing even to fans who otherwise liked the film.
|
The proves the point exactly about different people taking different things from it. We've discussed before that what a lot of people take from it is that you can't create a utopia. For all the supposed possibilities, the human race would do something to fuck it up; as Clu proved, there are those out there who can't not get greedy and powerhungry and then nothing is free anyway. We wouldn't live in harmony with what is in the Grid... we would go in, and conquer, and make it all like our way of life, and destroy anything in our way (the Bradbury book I mentioned in an earlier post, by the way, is The Martian Chronicles).
Also that if we eliminate disease and everyone lives forever and nothing bad ever happens, what kind of world is that? If we all go into the Grid, who's the poor schmuck who has to stay outside and keep the servers running? Etc. I get from it that rather than always chasing after the next best thing, maybe you should open your eyes and see what is good right in front of you. I'm not talking about settling for a shitty situation and not improving it, but knowing when you already have something good. You see, for example, that Quorra may be perpetuating the mistake Flynn has already learned from: he wanted to be in the Grid, and now she is fascinated by and wants to leave for the outside world. I wonder if she will find if it is truly better.
As far as beauty... in my fic, my character notes that she could never go to live permanently in a place without sun and stars (who needs a "digital frontier" when there are things about our own universe we still don't, and may never, understand? Ever read about physics as it relates to astronomy? Holy crap, these guys are taking educated stabs in the dark!) and the ocean, music and literature and the myriad of life and other such fantastical things found in our world (what on earth are ISOs to the diversity of just the bacteria found out here, never mind everything else?), "couldn’t imagine giving up the wonders of this world to become fully immersed in a place without ancient art, trees, warm winds…" For all that our world has some real horrors that might not be found on the Grid (which would not be erased by the Grid; if programs don't perpetuate some of the crimes that human beings do, users would just bring those crimes with them), our world also has a lot of beauty that the Grid lacks. I suppose it balances out (another conversation between my OC in my story and Tron, after she has just explained to him a rather painful human crime that apparently doesn't exist on the Grid:
“What kind of world do you live in?” he asked her quietly, his tone one of mild horror. Really it was a rhetorical question, but she answered it anyway.
“An imperfect one. Beauty is always tempered by ugliness, Tron. I know you know that.”
“In equal measure, I suppose,” he said, thinking of her descriptions of sunshine and oceans and the stars, balanced against the description of pain and betrayal she had just given him.
“Yes, maybe so.”
Our world has bad and good... perhaps greater bad, and its own share of problems, but also perhaps greater good, and certainly its own share of beauty and light. And forgetting that to idealize another place is, to me, an extremely sad example of not paying attention to what's around you, which is what Flynn learned. If nothing else, perhaps we could expend the effort that we're using to try to find some other utopia without this world's problems, to appreciate what we have and attempt to solve this world's problems instead so we won't NEED anywhere else.
I don't think Flynn should've said "perfection is unknowable ... it may be there right in front of you the whole time." That line bugged me. He should've said, "perfection is subjective and therefore unattainable for all ... and maybe what is there in front of you is already good enough without being perfect." What do you want? I'm busy.
Program, please!
Chaos.... good news. |
DarthMeow504 User
Posts: 134 | RE: Why does the world hate TRON Legacy? on Wednesday, July, 06, 2011 12:46 AM
No offense, Kat, but you can keep the meat and dirt world if you like it so much. I'll be punching the first ticket out of this shithole I can find.
|
Kat User
Posts: 2,394 | RE: Why does the world hate TRON Legacy? on Wednesday, July, 06, 2011 6:59 AM
DarthMeow504 Wrote:No offense, Kat, but you can keep the meat and dirt world if you like it so much. I'll be punching the first ticket out of this shithole I can find. |
Go for it. Guess I'll be keeping the lights on for you. What do you want? I'm busy.
Program, please!
Chaos.... good news. |
|