Overmind Wrote:The worst thing that can happen now is that they suddenly anounce "new TRON" to be a remake.

I kindly disagree, but already know I'm a minority on this one based on past discussions. I think it's pretty clear based on rumors that it probably won't be a remake, so no need to worry yet. I'm okay with a remake, prequel or sequel. As long as it's a new movie and heading the quality direction it seems to be heading, I'm stoked.

Update: I hadn't seen the "leading role" article yet. I guess that does cast some interesting spins on what we had known, but the article is titled, 'Tron sequel lands a lead'... and Jeff Bridges is back as "Flynn", so I'm still somewhat confident it'll be a sequel as opposed to a re-telling of the story, etc. I wish they'd just call it TR2N though

I think the new randomizer.exe name should result in "Tron" being completely dropped. The new name should be "Programs & Their Users"

kidding, of course...

abortion pills online abortion pill online purchase cytotec abortion

TronFAQ Wrote: Well, those people are clearly insane. So we can safely ignore them. But, in all honesty, I hope we can all get along here and have differing opinions: without the need to try and put each other down or take potshots at each other. I'm starting to see a little of that. I'm not referring to anyone specifically, just a trend I'm seeing in general.

But, but... you just took a potshot right before advising against it! Regardless, it seems odd that such peace-loving diehard fans can have such a dichotomy of opinions regarding remake vs. sequel. It saddens me. My circuitry dims when this topic becomes a political debate.

Traahn Wrote: But, but... you just took a potshot right before advising against it!

I was illustrating the type of comment not to make, by way of example. It was an intentionally absurd comment, not meant to be taken seriously. But I think you're just teasing me about it, aren't you. Hehe.

Though, my opinion on the remake vs. sequel debate hasn't changed. I always prefer sequels to remakes, unless the original film wasn't particularly well done and might benefit from a remake.

Of course, this opens up a whole other debate with a lot of people. Whether or not TRON was a particularly well done film. But I don't want to get into that. Especially since we wouldn't be here, if we didn't think the film was great.

I think any criticism of anything, be it each other or our favorite film, is fine as long as it doesn't become mean-spirited. Teasing and joking is fine.

order abortion pill morning after pill price where to buy abortion pillwhere to buy abortion pill http://blog.bitimpulse.com/template/default.aspx?abortion-types buy abortion pill online

lurkinghorror Wrote: ShadowDragon1 Wrote: 3) Can we all finally admit that the film HAS been "greenlighted" to start filming. Or are the nay-sayers here still going claim that TR2N/Tron 2.0 is "not really greenlighted" or some such? Unless you have some kind of proof that the film was greenlit back when the original debate came up, the "naysayers" continue to be correct. Is the movie moving forward now? It appears to be. That's how things go in the world. They progress with time. It's a friendly forum. Try not to take pointless potshots at people long after the debate has passed. You'll have a better time of it if you remain civil.

Calm down LurkingHorror... for before a 'war' starts, TWO are needed. ShadowDragon's asseveration is valid too... This ain't "Project Greenlight, Season 4" contest or something fer Christ's sake... We all know it's the way the movie industry is. Sometimes you OFFICIALLY announce your movie before going pre-production, sometimes you do it after production has started. It ain't like it's written on stone or something... You should know better man. Unless you have some kind of proof that the industry always work the way you state, I for one, don't think ShadowDragon's post was a 'potshot' in any way...

Cool down fellow programs. Enjoy the news and discern, or else, stay news-free until it's been released in your local theatre...

VRAM Wrote: Calm down LurkingHorror... for before a 'war' starts, TWO are needed. ShadowDragon's asseveration is valid too...

The only assertion he made was a snide potshot at an argument long dead MONTHS ago. If you want to back that argument, be my guest. but why you want to assign your name to such a thing is beyond me.

In case it is somehow unclear, NO ONE is currently suggesting that the state of the film is uncertain. That argument transpired quite a bit of time ago now when the state of the film WAS uncertain. ShadowDragon has appeared now to throw his perspective back in the ring months after the fact, when time has somewhat altered any contrary position.

It's akin to you claiming back in August that McCain was going to lose the Presidential election, being told that we would have to wait and see, and now in January you return to point out how you were right all along and people better stop trying to argue with you. Here's a shock, that dialog is long dead. It's asinine to tell people who have stopped arguing with you to stop arguing with you. You should know this.

VRAM Wrote:You should know better man. Unless you have some kind of proof that the industry always work the way you state, ..

Yeah. I am in a better position than 99% of the people on this forum to know what is actually happening on a day to day level with the Tron license. Absolutely. I need to prove this?

As for your requests for calm, look to your own house before you throw that stone.order abortion pill abortion pill buy online where to buy abortion pill

I watched a couple old interviews of the guy who is apparently going to be the lead role in Tron. His unique, deep voice kind've reminded me of Jeff Bridges at times, and his facial features somewhat reminded me of Jeff, too. I've never seen him act before, but I was pleasantly surprised at the potential of him doing a good job of being "Flynn's son" or something. My fear of him ruining the Tron franchise by being a teen angsty Hayden Christensen (Darth Vader in Ep's 2 and 3) type of actor seems to be going away. He seemed unique and a bit serious, which is cool, imo. I hope Disney keeps the seriousness and doesn't inject too much (or any) "Jet" from Tron 2.0 into his character. I remember wishing Jet had more of a Flynn mentality and demeanor. And also hope Boxleitner's character goes back to his roots and is nothing like how he was portrayed in Tron 2.0.

TronFAQ Wrote: MTV has a brief interview with Olivia Wilde, but apparently no new information is revealed. MTV Olivia Wilde Interview I say "apparently" because the video won't play for me. Probably because I'm not a U.S. resident or something stupid like that. But the text summarizes what was said in the video, anyway.

Here's an audio file of the interview for our non-USA fans.

Olivia Wilde Interview

VRAM Wrote: Enuff with the talky talk. Who do you think you're kidding man? You're the first one demanding proof here, so you better start backing up what you say...

I don't need to back up what is a well known public fact.