http://www.tagworld.com/snakesonaplane
....in a comedic sort of way...

But I still can't wait to see it!

This is so funny! The title says it all. So if this movie does well, will we see a sequal? Snakes on a Train

What a silly idea...

redrain85 Wrote:Oh man, Hollywood really has run out of ideas.

Yes they have!

But, at least this is not another been-there-done-that remake or sequel.

There are some big-budget remakes coming out this summer. They look pretty... but I could really give a crap about any of them.

To pick one out, do we really need another Superman?

I enjoyed the 70's version. It was pretty damn cool back in the day. Pretty much everyone's seen it I'm sure.

This summer there will be another Superman film.

Why?

Oh yeah - they had to take the same old thing from last (my) generation, repackage it with today's effects and modernize it some, and throw it back out at new audiences.

Sorry. I think that's lame. It will also make a ton of money. Good business sense, but lame on the creative side.

I imagine I'll be ranting about it again in another 30 or so years. I'm sure they'll do it again, in whatever form of entertainment is equivalent to today's film. That's what they do - rehash, remake, and repackage! Easy way to make a quick buck... or quick millions. Have to remember Hollywood is a business FIRST, the creative element is not even a close second.

Of course, one sequel I'd LOVE to see is a worthy sequel to TRON. But when it comes to recognizing great films and great concepts, Hollywood doesn't have clue. Well, at least more often than not they don't.


EDIT: Sorry for the negativity. I'm just so irritated with how Hollywood goes about stuff these days. They could make a bundle WIHTOUT rehashing stuff... or putting out dumb snake movies. They just generally don't.
where to buy abortion pill ordering abortion pills to be shipped to house buy abortion pill online

Bongo-- seemed to be mixed reviews on this one. I went to see the movie last night with Silver and some friends. Thought it was pretty good. (I never read the source material.)order abortion pill http://unclejohnsprojects.com/template/default.aspx?morning-after-pill-price where to buy abortion pillwhere to buy abortion pill ordering abortion pills to be shipped to house buy abortion pill online

Boingo_Buzzard Wrote: I am THINKING about V for Vendetta, but it could possibly be bad.

Alan Moore (Who made the comic that the Film was based on) HATED the script.


So, I won't see it.

Oh. I didn't realize it was a Wachowski bros. film. I probably won't go see it now.

Prankster bit Wrote:...what else... aah, Hugo Weaving wearing a mask for the whole film. i feel sorry for him, because he couldn't really express any emotion..

I know nothing of the original comic that this film is based on, and only saw probably 1 or 2 quick commercials for this film in the week before it came out.

But am I the only one who immediately thought:


B For Burger King?



I'm sorry - it just looked really bad to me.

It looked like they tried to make something so big and with such a powerful message... I just yawned and thought "Burger King mascot plays Zoro-like character". I bet this film cost a bundle too!

No offense to anyone who enjoyed it. I just found it laughable (the commercial and concept - don't care to see the film).

Of course, this comes from a guy who thought Mars Attacks was pure genius. LOVED that film! The rest of the world didn't quite get it.

Prankster bit Wrote:bloody hell, you think they're really that bad?

Not bad, just boring. Their concept of entertainment seems to be long drawn out fight scenes with bullets flying everywhere and slow motion kung fu. That kind of stuff is OK for a while, but they REALLY overuse it. I just end up almost falling asleep in their movies.

"V" looked like some promising sci-fi but I'd be willing to bet it's just long extended fight scenes.

abortion pills online abortion pill online purchase cytotec abortion

Boingo_Buzzard Wrote: Prankster bit Wrote:bloody hell, you think they're really that bad? Not bad, just boring. Their concept of entertainment seems to be long drawn out fight scenes with bullets flying everywhere and slow motion kung fu. That kind of stuff is OK for a while, but they REALLY overuse it. I just end up almost falling asleep in their movies. "V" looked like some promising sci-fi but I'd be willing to bet it's just long extended fight scenes.

actually, i recall about 3-5 fight scenes, lasting about 5 minutes max. a lot of V for vendetta is dialogue and narrative. this makes the fight scenes stand out more. even though one is more of a slaughter [ V killing between 7-10 people in the time it takes to reload a revolver... in fact, that's my favourite bit in the whole movie]. naturally, in typical wachowski style, parts of this are done in slow motion, but with daggers instead of bullets, but they still leave a distortion trail [of sorts].


i hope i didn't just spoil anything