VRAM Wrote: All right, I thought there must've been some kind of misunderstanding or confusion here along the road because, to be honest, I just didn't understand your replies LurkingHorror, so I checked this thread's history too and on page 39 (back in October) ShadowDragon posted the exact same thing and I saw you didn't reply or something... so I too apologize if anything I stated seemed offensive in any way, that was not my intention, and as TRON.dll says "lets not go completely insane over small details"... Everything's cool man. In fact, I'm kinda 'excited' to know that the franchise IS alive and kicking in the world of comics!?... Am I correct? SLG renewed the TRON license?

At the moment, SLG has not renewed it's contract to produce new material. Whether it will or not is not a matter I could comment on. What I can say is that while the publishing license has (very) recently expired, the interaction between the two companies has not simply dissolved. There is still a matter of the as of yet unpublished collection. My impression is that both Disney and SLG would prefer that the previously created material is not simply swept under the rug. I certainly didn't intend to give the impression that new material was currently being developed at SLG. I simply meant that just because the rights to publish new material expire, it doesn't mean that all business communications are severed.

My personal opinion is that there will be more Tron comics in the future. But as to who will be publishing and creating them... time will tell. On the creative side, I would suspect that the direction of the new film would inform the direction of any future ancillary product.

There was an earlier exchange between myself and ShadowDragon, back in August. But it was minor and civil. I was associating a seperate argument on the same topic with him, and it cast his current statements in a unfair negative light. It was totally my misunderstanding. My apologies once more.

i remember seeing this last summer:
http://technology.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/tech_and_web/article4557935.ece
pretty impressive

is this the same tech?

When they use the term Stereoscopic 3D I assume they are talking about using this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Real_D_Cinema

What I like after seeing the small video and reading some of the information that was given. The throughput of the calculation was something like 2.4 teraflops of calculations a second for rendering. And compared it to a supercomputer that had that kind of computation throughput 12 years ago. Sorry if I get into the technical aspects of things like this. For me when I see things like this I usually like to know the kind of hardware that they are using for these things to get an idea of whats going on not only in the front but also on the backside. Which usually impress me on cases like this. Even if it some technical data.

isMetaClass Wrote:i remember seeing this last summer: http://technology.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/tech_and_web/article4557935.ece pretty impressive is this the same tech?

abortion pills online abortion pill online purchase cytotec abortion

Yeppers. And here is something slightly out of our leagues. But if money was no object this would be nice to have and to use. (It would be over kill to have this as a fully loaded gaming rig in all ways possible. When it is fully equiped and raided.) Here is the link from Cray about their. http://www.cray.com/Products/CX1.aspx Take a look at the small demo and the brochure of this product from them. To get an idea of what I am looking at here. And not to out do your thing either. Very nifty and good idea there for the animation rendering.

Jademz Wrote: Compucore Wrote:What I like after seeing the small video and reading some of the information that was given. The throughput of the calculation was something like 2.4 teraflops of calculations a second for rendering. And compared it to a supercomputer that had that kind of computation throughput 12 years ago. Sorry if I get into the technical aspects of things like this. For me when I see things like this I usually like to know the kind of hardware that they are using for these things to get an idea of whats going on not only in the front but also on the backside. Which usually impress me on cases like this. Even if it some technical data. isMetaClass Wrote:i remember seeing this last summer: http://technology.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/tech_and_web/article4557935.ece pretty impressive is this the same tech? Yeah the new Vcards by AMD(Radeon) - 2.4 teraflops Radeon HD 4870 X2 is there, nice analogy. http://www.radeon.com/ ...but wow... this thing is sweet! hehe

Here's a link you may find interesting - a rocket RAID!
0.865,234,375 GBps.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VNPPRhPV7y0

Barbatolux Wrote: "I received many questions, so here's few answers : "I used 2 motherboards (second one is just present to power IRam Cards) + PCI Risers and Extenders. 8 Irams are connected to HighPoint 2320 Controler (Raid 0) and PCI-E is overclocked (112 Mhz)".

Would anyone else like to see TR2N in IMAX 3-D?

What is the likelihood of that happening? on line abortion pill misoprostol dose abortion medical abortion pill onlineabortion pills online abortion questions cytotec abortion

This isn't news . . . just an amusing anecdote.

I know for a fact that a number of Garrett Hedlund fans are lurking here, but have yet to post. Well, don't worry, we won't bite. We're not all sharks.

Yeah, maybe we're kind of hard-core, but you have to remember that we saw the film as kids and we grew up with it. We just want the sequel to do justice to the original, that's all. To update it, without totally throwing away everything about the original that we remember. Naturally, we're going to question and examine every new announcement, hoping for the best. And that includes the casting of actors like Garrett.

Oh, and apparently I put someone to sleep with my massive list of updates about the sequel. Well, sorry . . . but you have to understand, Disney was extremely cagey about whether or not the sequel was actually going to happen, for about half a year. So, naturally, we're all asking "well, is it or isn't it actually happening?"

So, don't be shy, and go ahead and post.

I think this is a new interview, but I could be wrong. (sorry if I am)

Olivia Wilde talks TRON 2 and House
http://www.craveonline.com/articles/filmtv/04652861/olivia_wilde_talks_tron_2_and_house.htmlon line abortion pill misoprostol dose abortion medical abortion pill online

Boingo_Buzzard Wrote: This is the second time she has said this in an interview and I have to disagree. I don't think the computer graphics or designs look dated at all. Maybe the scenes in the "real world". I personally feel that Tron has stood the test of time and looks just as good now as it did back then.

She's confusing retro with authentic. It's not just that Tron has stood the test of time, but something cannot be retro when it's the genuine article. One particular dictionary definition sums it up quite well: "A fashion, decor, design, or style reminiscent of things past."

This is not unlike the Alanis Morissette song where she misuses the word ironic. Albeit on a much smaller scale.
where to buy abortion pill abortion types buy abortion pill online