Yeah, the trailor is spoilish, I agree, but if it helps bring people in to see it, then that's good. I'm one who doesn't mind spoilers, it actually makes me wonder how it got to that point in the first place, but it is understandable that others don't want to know what happens; let the whole movie be a suprise in of it self.


Also, on the moustache debate, I don't think Flynn, CGI or not, really would have looked good with one. It may help with the Uncanny Valley affect, but a simple moustache just seems out of place with him in my oppinion. It just somehow doesn't fit his face, but it's more then likely my prefrence.

And that is why they use rendering farms that are high end computers to do the movies and save it on a file somewhere on the server as they do movies and for game wise They ease up for playing games. Since if they used the technologies for the movie no one could afford the rig that they used to play the game itself. Or a really good high performance computer like the cray cx1 to play the game itself.

TRON.dll Wrote: Tron Fanatic Wrote: cirlin Wrote:I doubt they used the exact same models as the needs of a 3D object or character in a movie are much more intense than what a game engine/home computer can handle. However they have said that they worked directly with the movie effects people and shared resources. This could mean that they used some of the same textures, or even some of the models as a starting point to create the in-game versions. Couldn't they? Both games and CGI can use metaballs, stretchy meshes, and the like, and those models are usually dynamic. You can choose to have it consist of 1000 triangles or 100,000 triangles. I know they shared some "resources" between the game and the movie, but the main issue with sharing models between a movie like Tron Legacy and Tron Evolution is that Legacy's models have ridiculously high numbers of polygons. Video games will likely always be behind movies in the sense that video games cannot display as many polygons at a time as a movie can. The reason behind this is that video games are rendering everything in real time (for people that don't know, a rendered image is what you see in a finished cgi product). For movies, the whole film has already been rendered on a set of 100+ computers dedicated to rendering that movie. It's not being rendered frame-by-frame as you watch, like a video game. Because movies are rendered, converted to a video file, and put on a DVD/Blu-Ray/Laserdisc/other entertainment medium before you watch them, they require significantly less processing power to view. A video game, on the other hand, is rendering each frame in real time. Because of this, the number of polygons in a game world has to be significantly lower than that of a movie. A movie won't slow down if it has a ton of polygons, it'll just take longer to render. The same applies to games, in a way. They don't really slow down, it just takes longer for them to render each frame. Anyone who legitimately read that whole thing gets 10 points.

c1 Wrote:Play some Wendy Carlos Tron music, it is soothing the soul http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FQgnTeLSZhs

AAAHHHHHH!
nice

that music has a majesty and mystery that i love

For anyone interested in Joseph Kosinski's demo reel you can check it out here:

http://vimeo.com/9261902
I can see why he was chosen for Tron Legacy.

Entertainment Tonight Behind the Scenes of Tron Legacy

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PUAyAXd39E0&feature=fvwkwhere to buy abortion pill abortion types buy abortion pill online