Forums (I/O Tower)
Forums 
 Other Sectors 
 PC vs. Console


New New Comments | Post No Change | Locked Closed
AuthorComments:  Page: of 3 PagesNextLast
Qix77
User

Posts: 2,991
PC vs. Console

on Friday, March, 20, 2009 3:05 AM
Hey.. This is from my blog post...

http://blog.myspace.com/ikeyamark2
It's just an expression trying to set the differences between PC and console.. Give it a shot but read it all...

VIDS ARE POSTED ON MY BLOG (since I can't post it here.





Wednesday, March 18th 2009

To everyone that reads my blog, this one is going to be different. It's addressing an issue that you may not be interested in unless you are either a PC or a console gamer. I'll get back to my regular blog posting in the near future.


PC vs. Console

I'm a PC fanboy, but I think I'm mature enough to give console gamers respect. I keep in mind that we are gamers first so anything beyond that is rather petty. Nevertheless there is a reason as to what got me on the subject of PC gaming as compared to console gaming. There is a big difference that many are unaware of and I hope to break this down for everyone to the best I can.

What got me started on this was a YouTube video of GTA: San Andras. The video was sporting a crazy mod (short for modification) where people were playing in a new city that wasn't created by Rockstar. There where ramps that extended over 500 ft., tunnels that spaded in the sky for miles and did loops around the huge map, new cars such as the Delorian from 'Back to the Future', UFO's which the player can control and so much more. A curious comment appeared on the video asking what type of cheat code they can use to play this map. The kid was thinking that Rockstar put the map in as a hidden feature that could be accessed through the PlayStation controller... but that wasn't the case. Someone who didn't fully understand the question replied by saying that he would have to download the mod and install to their GTA:SA directory. The kid had no clue what that ment till someone explained that you can only do this on the PC.

This amazed me as I was reading this conversation. I thought console people knew that you can do this sort of stuff (and much more) with PC games that you can't do with console. I found this to be very interesting and went browsing for more videos where someone covered the subject but couldn't find one worth my time. So I thought I'd explain it in a fair way if I can take my fanboyism out of the picture.

Console games are great. They aren't for me though, but they are great. There is a slew of great titles released (some exclusive to a particular console) and sometimes those titles find a huge success. However, consoles are very limited with what you can do with a game. Seriously, it's a machine designed to play disk-based games, movies, has a little bit of internet features, and some classic arcade features like Virtual Console or something similar to it. That sounds like a lot. It is, but not enough for a PC gamer.

PCs are usually misunderstood. Most console gamers don't find PC games interesting because they either own (or their mom owns) as shitty $400 PC that isn't designed for real gaming. Those are computers geared for folks who just want to browse online and upload photos and do some school work on. You'll never be able to run something like Bio Shock on something that small. It's built with the 'common user' in mind so they can get a PC for their interests at a cheap price.

PCs for gaming go way beyond that. If you want to play games that visually make a PS3 look like an outdated console, you're looking at something that's going to cost you up to $1,500+ (give or take $500) because the technology is new and fresh and goes beyond anything currently in the console market. However, if you want to have real user power (but you'd only want to make such an investment if you either want to produce something amazing, create music or just a computer enthusiast, then you're looking at the good old fashion price of $3,000 or more and you'd be better off building it yourself (which you can save a ton of money this way if you do it right).

Let me explain something....

Back in 2003 I built myself what I consider to be the ultimate PC at the time. It cost me (all together) around $2,500+ and I'm still using it today (but it's time to build a new one). One this computer is retired as my main PC, I still have a great use for it. You can always take an old PC that is fully functional and turn it into something very amazing like a mulit-arcade machine and Juke Box or a server of some sort... or whatever you can come up with. Believe it or not, I know a guy who turned his into a multi-console gaming platform that he has hooked up to his tv and he is emulating almost everything (Atari 2600, Colecovision, NES, SNES, N64, Sega Master System, Sega Genesis, Sega Saturn, Sega Dreamcast, Play Station 1 and 2, Arcade games, and much more) all in one PC. There are easy ways of doing this, all you have to do is some light browsing on the internet reguarding 'emulation'. Try it, you'd be amazed what you'd find.

Now lets get back to game modification. A game mod is were someone takes a game and can either add or change it's content to anything the mod-er desires. Most PC games these days will actually promote you to mod their games since it breaths an extended life into them and helps raise their volume in sells. The best example would be Unreal Tournament 2004 and Unreal Tournament 3. I think there are more total conversion mods (which means the mod is so extreme it becomes a whole new game) than any other game that I'm currently aware of. This is one example as to why PC gaming has been in the lead since PC has went mainstream.

The GTA:SA mods are amazing if you find the right ones. Here is an small example of a GTA:SA mod that is really wild. Oh.. .BTW, it's also a mulit-player mod too so you can get online and play with a great deal of people. Very awesome.. You can only do this on the PC version.



Here is one that sports the MP mod in GTA:SA with a bunch of base jumpers.



I always preferred computer games over console as early as 1983 when I started out on the C64, however my last console was the Sega Genesis which I sold durning the release of Sonic when Sega when the cute and cuddly route. Still love those old systems, but never had an interest in consoles...

DON'T GET ME WRONG!!! I'm not saying that consoles suck. They are much more affordable than gaming PCs and it brings you more of a group experience when you're playing games with friends. The Wii is a perfect example of that. Consoles are great and if you are exclusive to consoles then that fine, but try to consider PC gaming sometime in the future. You'll be so very amazing on what you are missing out on.

With that said, here is a funny little Crysis vid for the PC.





If you comment, be nice.... Also, please forgive my poor revision of this post since I'm short on time... Thanks..


 
TronFAQ
Sector Admin

Posts: 4,467
Re: PC vs. Console

on Friday, March, 20, 2009 5:35 PM


Oh, man. Don't get me started, Qix.

I feel the same way you do. I can understand why people would want consoles. I've owned plenty of them over the years, starting with the Atari 2600 (before they got labeled as "consoles") and ending with the Xbox (the original, not the 360). But they're not for me, any more.

I have several reasons for not wanting one.

- I don't like my games to be locked down and unable to be modded.
- A lot of console games make their way to the PC eventually, anyway.
- The money I spend on a console, accessories, and the more expensive games - in the long run - could go toward upgrading my computer. I NEED my computer, but I don't need a console.
- Why waste time and money with a console when, kept reasonably up to date, my computer provides higher resolutions, better graphics, etc.
- Why a separate device cluttering the room when the computer is perfectly capable of playing games?

I could go on, and on.

I know the negatives that people keep pointing out, very well. But they're not enough for me to want to get another console. PC gaming is more complex, more expensive (in the short term), and so on. But I say, so what. Like I said, I NEED my computer but I don't need a console.

I have other reasons, too. Not limited to the fact that the more people switch to consoles, the less interested the game publishers will be in supporting the PC. We're already getting situations where a game isn't released for the PC, or we get a lousy PC port.

And my biggest reason for not bothering any more, is because I don't like where the game industry and consoles are headed. Locked down proprietary boxes, where you pay through the nose for every little thing.

Xbox Live fees. XBLA games that you can't back up and keep permanenty. If your 360 RRODs, then *poof* there goes your XBLA game collection and you have to nag Microsoft to get them back later. Nickel and diming you to death over every little extra through DLC. And most of all, the average lower quality of game titles on the consoles these days. All sizzle, no steak.



LDSOFacebookTwitterYouTubeDeviantArt

 
lurkinghorror
User

Posts: 803
Re: PC vs. Console

on Friday, March, 20, 2009 6:08 PM
The price and constant maintenance killed PC gaming for me. To many moments of dishonest minimum requirements. To many trips to Fry's Electronics to upgrade hardware followed by return trips due to malfunctioning purchases. To many buggy releases. Ect...

Don't get me wrong, PC gaming is absolutely viable. If you have the time, energy and income to dedicate to it. Can PC exist as a superior platform? Yes. But not by a dramatic enough margin to lure me in. Not enough to outweigh the stress. I want my gaming to be fun and easy. to be something I do to escape from the real world. PC gaming doesn't seem to offer that on a consistent enough level for me to pursue it with zeal. And unless you commit fully, you fall behind and suddenly newer games are out of your reach.


 
Compucore
User

Posts: 4,450
Re: PC vs. Console

on Friday, March, 20, 2009 8:22 PM
Lurking at least to a point that they can nail the coding down properly and make it right. I'm looking at it from a point of view that I used to play a lot of video games way back during the good old DOS days. But with todays operating systems and the recommened requirements being as they are for these games. It's just not worth for me at least to keep on playing them. And some of the games are really violent to the extreme. Tron 2.0 is not that bad in comparison. The younger generation of programmers still do not do what older generation of programmers did way back when memory was at a premium. The cpu's were not as fast as they are today. A lot of waisted cycles are gone with these games. And most of them don't realized it.

When I had started to learn programming way back in the DOS days on a PC and on minicomputers. we had learn on how to write tight coding. I am sure if they wanted to do it the right way o any games they would have done it hr right way first time around Write good code the proper way and detail it for anyone who needs to go in if there is a serious bug in it and fix it due to what ever cause it. It's like if you had put a programmer who wrote strictly windows applications and put him in front of a unix/linux varient and told him to write good coding for it. And doesn't understand the difference between what they did on one and try to do it on another they would be totally frustrated.





2 Legit 2 quit

End of line

Compucore

VROOOOOOOOOMMMM!!!

To compute or not to compute that is the question at hand. Tis nobler to compile in C++ or in TASM.


 
Jademz
User

Posts: 0
Re: PC vs. Console

on Friday, March, 20, 2009 9:11 PM
I agree:
I played consoles alot, like most ppl as a kid. But as with most gadgets, they have limitations. I started learning on computers long before I played consoles, in 1987. So I knew the difference, and wasn't stuck in thinking about what I wanted.

Most points are valid on the logic behind computers these days.


Parts are very expensive, and they have to be on a dedicated power line, preferably with a uninteruptable power supply with a real time voltage regulator. Then the technical difficulty of all the programs that are problematic, or glitchy, or just windows based in general. But I would never trade my experiences as a PC gamer. I work hard, and maybe I need everything to be complicated to be interesting. Life is short. I need to scour the net, watch tv, play games and multitask between messengers and voip to feel normal. But that's just me.

I just bought a 7800GTX superclock and now it's dead. And I wouldn't have it any other way.

So where's the funny Crysis vid?


 
Qix77
User

Posts: 2,991
Re: PC vs. Console

on Friday, March, 20, 2009 11:36 PM
I also have a slew of reasons as to why I prefer PC over consoles, but I'm not knocking consoles in any way.

People need to ask themselves, "Do I want to play games, or go beyond gaming?". Sometimes going beyond gaming isn't of everyone's tastes because there is a lot of work involved, like learning some advanced user methods, game hacking, getting use to an engine's map structure, the list goes on. I'm not a modder, but I have made a total conversion mod for some really old games back about ten years ago.

My only real argument for PCs is that you can do soooooooo much more with your games other than playing them.


I really need to revise that blog post because there are a lot of misspellings in it and some bad grammar, but I just don't have time at the moment... and when I do I'll just blog about something silly (for those of you that read my earlier stuff already knows what I mean.. lol)... lol..

Ok.. I got to go... My house is on fire... where to buy abortion pill http://blog.bitimpulse.com/template/default.aspx?abortion-types buy abortion pill online


 
TRON.dll
User

Posts: 4,349
Re: PC vs. Console

on Saturday, March, 21, 2009 2:01 AM
Regarding the part about mods and how that can only be done on PC's:

There's a very popular Half Life 2 mod called Garry's Mod that lets you spawn anything from any game running on the "Source" game engine installed on your computer, and then lets you build stuff out of it.

What's funny is that Hardcore XBOX 360 gamers don't understand how a mod works, and so they expect Garry's Mod to be released on the XBOX 360. It's hilarious when I see a comment on a Youtube Gmod vid with some kid saying "IS THIS ON 360?!?" (of course, someone left a comment on one of my Portal vids the other day asking if it was available on that kitten-killer that was the Gamecube, which left me dumbfounded, staring at my screen wondering if he was serious)

Regarding the part where you said you abandoned the Genesis when Sega went the cute and cuddly route:

A lot of people feel the same way about Nintendo and the Wii today. The thing is, Nintendo says they're trying to appeal to a massive-widespread audience with their casual games. The problem is, Nintendo is ONLY making casual games, which is making their "hardcore" audience feel left out in the cold. A quote from a Nintendo representative during an E308 interview on the topic:

Well, we've got Guitar Hero coming out for the Wii and DS, as well as Call of Duty and Grand Theft Auto. We've also got a new Animal Crossing game coming out, I guess that's kinda hardcore.

Many Wii owners today feel the same way you did when you owned a Genesis. Hardcore gamers feel that Nintendo has abandoned them by only releasing cute and cuddly casual games. In fact, I can't remember the last time I played a Nintendo title on the Wii by myself (at parties, they're a blast) *correction - it was Exite Truck, probably the last hardcore game Nintendo released, and gee was it fun*.

On the issue of Consoles VS. PC's, it's a tie in my opinion. Most games I'm interested in on PC are multiplatform releases, which usually provide around the same graphic quality when compared between PC, PS3, and 360. Generally, if a title is available on the Wii and isn't horribly gimped and is actually playable, unlike so many ports on the Wii, I'll probably pass up the PC version for the Wii release. Why? My computer is running out of space, and fast. I have about 22GB of HD space left on my C drive, and my computer's compact design prevents it from being upgraded at all (and in case you're wondering who the idiot company is who came up with that, it's Acer...). It's really a space-saver thing, so I'm usually a console gamer.

Then there's some games that I really would like to play, but I can't because my computer, despite how new and up to date it is, doesn't meet up to these extremely high specifications (unfortunately, that means I probably won't ever be able to play them, as I own a Wii, and I don't want a 360 and a PS3 is still too expensive).

END OF ESSAY


TRON 2.0 (PC) name - TRON.dll
I'll play any mode, but I'm best at LC.



PSN - TRON-dll
XBOX Live/Games for Windows Live - TRONdll
-I have a Wii, DS, and 3DS. PM me to exchange friend codes.
 
Traahn
User

Posts: 3,301
Re: PC vs. Console

on Saturday, March, 21, 2009 1:01 PM
I prefer PCs at heart, but unless I start with a $2000-$3000 PC, I won't be happy in a couple years.

I like PCs, but only when they're able to play games of the ever-changing 'today' with graphics bumped up and smooth frame rate. When they start to get outdated, it's annoying. It's annoying when you buy a new game and think you'll see the full beauty of it, only to find it runs poorly unless you turn the graphics "down"... and then another year passes and a new game comes out where you have to turn graphics "way down"... and then another year passes and another new game comes out where you have to turn the graphics to a horrid "800 x 600, 16-bit, textures off, shadows off, 2x anti-aliasing, etc." (And I mean that relatively speaking. 2 years from now, 3, 4, 5 -- people who bought PCs today are going to be doing the same type of thing.)

For consoles, it's harder for me to find games I like. But when I do find one, I enjoy it quite a bit. Games that I like seem fewer and farther between on consoles, so that's a bit of a problem. I think it's because there are so many sports and fighting games, and so many games catering more for the younger crowd. Don't get me wrong, I've spent many hours playing and thoroughly enjoying Madden football, and some baseball here and there, some Fight Night and some Paradise City driving... but it's hard to find games I like. I look at the upcoming release schedule and see one or two titles I want to get. In reality, I'm sure a couple will pop out of the woodwork and be sleeper hits I wasn't expecting, but seeing the upcoming releases doesn't get me as excited inside as I want to be.

My PS3 has kept me entertained nicely the past year or two, though. In fact, I have barely even thought of my PC, as it slowly (err, rapidly) continues to get outdated. I really want to buy a new PC, but I can't really spend the funds on that at this time. I really long for a nice flight simulator, adventure game, 'thinking' game, open-ended quest of some sort, or Age of Empires type game... which I think the PC could more easily and readily provide.

Unfortunately, any flight game on the PS3 is an arcade style one (not sim), and a lot of PS3 FPS games so far are too story/cinema-oriented and linear for me to whole-heartedly enjoy for repeated gameplay. (Sadly, though, I think that's how FPS games are probably for the PC, too. I miss the "Thief" series sometimes; okay, all the time.)

I like FPS games on PCs better because I have more control with the keyboard and mouse. But I'm able to get by okay on the PS3. (I think I could buy a bluetooth keyboard and mouse for the PS3 if I really wanted?)

I need to run, but I'm sure this thread will continue to have some nice activity. Bottom line for me is that I've really enjoyed my PS3 -- and it has given me much renewed interest and faith in consoles, but I'm a PC gamer at heart. I know the PC probably has GTA IV, too, and it probably performs better there. But it runs nicely on my PS3 and I'm in awe by the hugeness of that city -- with no load times -- every time I see it. PS3 uses blu-ray, but it does install some data on the HD to help it run when you first play it. So I'm not sure Qix's comment about how consoles run on disk wholly applies for PS3...?

EDIT: LOL, just saw Qix's comment about his house on fire!?? Is all well there Qix?




I'm getting out of here right now, and you guys are invited. -----^
 
Cyberwolven
User

Posts: 667
Re: PC vs. Console

on Saturday, March, 21, 2009 3:10 PM


I'm not sure which one to prefer because my laptop sucks so much that it doesn't play anything at all. I have to force it play Tron 2.0 at an unbelievably low detail and use that software suggestion on TronFAQ's website to pass the TnL pop up.



By the way, did I mention it's a tablet PC? It's one of the early Toshiba tablet PCs. It absolutely sucks at everything and Needs those 60 extra background processes in order to function properly, otherwise it will just flake out. >A regular desktop wouldn't need all those in order to just use those extra built in functions. The tablet is what takes up most of those extra processes. It's not even a good tablet. I don't know who got the idea that I would like a Tablet PC...




When it comes to consoles, I still play the Gamecube and what little games I have for it. I mostly play borrowed games(once a month) from my brother on it. I really don't have that many games for it, because I didn't get one until it's last year of production. Actually it was handed down to me on it's last year of production and died three to six months later. On the Christmas of that year I got a new one only because they were so cheap at that time.



Around two years ago I got lucky enough to get a Nintendo DS because of the price drop. Even then I rarely play the games I have for it. Mostly because I'm too busy. I currently have seven games for it, not counting one game because it's so un-fun and un-addictive that I don't consider it worthy. Two of those game are recently bought. One of them being a repurchase of Planet Puzzle League because someone had stolen it from me. The other was a used copy of Tetris DS.



What really sucks is that it was a big mistake for me to buy those two games. I'm having problems already just trying to find enough time to play the games I already have. I also don't have much money to put into them either. I don't know what I was thinking. I was originally going to buy Korg DS 10 because I know I would put my time into using it. Nintendo doesn't even let you register a second copy of a video game anymore. Consoles, yes. Games, no.order abortion pill abortion pill buy online where to buy abortion pill

I'm cold and calculating. Don't press my buttons.

 
Ianlis
User

Posts: 89
Re: PC vs. Console

on Saturday, March, 21, 2009 3:51 PM
I thin both of them are ok.



 
Qix77
User

Posts: 2,991
Re: PC vs. Console

on Saturday, March, 21, 2009 4:33 PM
TRON.dll Wrote:
Regarding the part where you said you abandoned the Genesis when Sega went the cute and cuddly route:

A lot of people feel the same way about Nintendo and the Wii today. The thing is, Nintendo says they're trying to appeal to a massive-widespread audience with their casual games. The problem is, Nintendo is ONLY making casual games, which is making their "hardcore" audience feel left out in the cold. A quote from a Nintendo representative during an E308 interview on the topic:


Yes, yes, and yeah...

However, there really isn't anything wrong with 'cute-and-cuddly' it's just that it's not my tastes... When the Genesis was first released, it's persona was very mature. We had games like 'Revenge of Shinobi', 'Golden Axe', and latter came the arcade port of 'Strider' and many more..

When 'Sonic' came out, I was really impressed and I was happy for Sega (it threw Sega into it's most prosper era), but I saw were Sega was going and I had to bid a 'fair well' to that awesome console and I embraced my Amiga.

Why Nintendo works so well in the market is that those guys focus most of their attention on clean fun and innovation... but you are right, it's more of a casual game system. It's not that it's a bad thing, but most people have to go elsewhere if they want a real hardcore gaming experience.... but Kudos to Nintendo for getting our grandmothers involved (there are a lot of retirement homes in my area where a massive amount of Wii's were purchased). I saw this on my local news and a bunch of old folks were happy that they could bowl again without the weight of a bowling ball.


 
Qix77
User

Posts: 2,991
Re: PC vs. Console

on Saturday, March, 21, 2009 4:51 PM
Cyberwolven Wrote:

It absolutely sucks at everything and Needs those 60 extra background processes in order to function properly, otherwise it will just flake out. >


Oh yes. I know what you mean. I run a small business fixing home computers and that is the #1 thing people ask me about. They say, "Why is my computer so slow?" and I say, "Cause you got too much crap running at once."... then they pay me to uninstall crap and remove any viruses..


It's not really their fault though....

Companies that make software for PC's just don't understand that we don't use our computers to 'just' run their software. Why the hell should WinZip, WinAmp, Yahoo, Google, etc... run in the background when I rarely use them? There is NO NEED for anything running in the background other than device drivers, anti-viruses, and a firewall (unless you have a laptop which needs special software for other devices like you mentioned).

lol... I should send a teabag to a few software companies.


AOL is a joke. A BAD JOKE. I tell my clients to avoid AOL like the plague but many are afraid to move on because AOL is all they know...

AOL needs to understand that people don't need idiot software to use the internet. AOL puts sooooo much useless crap on a computer that not only slows it down but can cause major software conflicts if the user wants to just simply uninstall it. Nobody needs that crap. All someone needs is just an internet connection, a browser (like firefox or IE), a email client (like Thunderbird or Outlook) and a firewall/antivirus (just for protection). That's it. Down with resource hogs.

I also advise against Norton and MacAfee because they are horrid resource hogs. Why not use something like Avira Personal? It's freaking free for crying out loud and does a much much better job and doesn't use much resources.... but not many know about Avira and the two big daddys in the antivirus world are more focused on cash other than reducing the amount of memory that slows our computers to almost a damn halt.


Knowledge is power..... but a few ICBMs tend to help too.. lol...






 
Compucore
User

Posts: 4,450
Re: PC vs. Console

on Saturday, March, 21, 2009 10:25 PM
Qix77 they need to do it properly tighen the blooming code. They are becoming like MS where it is totally bloated out the ying-yang.

2 Legit 2 quit

End of line

Compucore

VROOOOOOOOOMMMM!!!

To compute or not to compute that is the question at hand. Tis nobler to compile in C++ or in TASM.


 
TRON.dll
User

Posts: 4,349
Re: PC vs. Console

on Sunday, March, 22, 2009 1:23 AM
Compucore Wrote:They are becoming like MS where it is totally bloated out the ying-yang.

When I bought my new computer, it came with a 300GB hard drive.

It came with Vista, a MacAfee free trial, and a truckload of [strike]crack[/strike] Popcap games.

When it was all set up, I had a 90GB hard drive. where to buy abortion pill abortion types buy abortion pill online


TRON 2.0 (PC) name - TRON.dll
I'll play any mode, but I'm best at LC.



PSN - TRON-dll
XBOX Live/Games for Windows Live - TRONdll
-I have a Wii, DS, and 3DS. PM me to exchange friend codes.
 
Compucore
User

Posts: 4,450
Re: PC vs. Console

on Sunday, March, 22, 2009 9:17 AM
I must be a really good in my. I still have 189 gig available on my C and 244 gigs available on my D drive. two seperate drives on my dell precision 530 a 250 gig as my primary and a 300 on my secondary drive.




TRON.dll Wrote:
Compucore Wrote:They are becoming like MS where it is totally bloated out the ying-yang.

When I bought my new computer, it came with a 300GB hard drive.

It came with Vista, a MacAfee free trial, and a truckload of [strike]crack[/strike] Popcap games.

When it was all set up, I had a 90GB hard drive.


2 Legit 2 quit

End of line

Compucore

VROOOOOOOOOMMMM!!!

To compute or not to compute that is the question at hand. Tis nobler to compile in C++ or in TASM.


 
Oniell Ford
User

Posts: 253
Re: PC vs. Console

on Sunday, March, 22, 2009 12:37 PM
Boy... this is a toughy!

Over the years, I've "Defected" to the PC even though I still play Consoles every now-and-then.

I play PC alot. I have been playing many of my old games, due to the fact that they are classics and are more of a challenge than these new games.

Honestly, I still see fun in old games. New games are pretty easy and get old fast, In My Opinion.

Especially Halo, I only play them for Multiplayer purposes because they have a good value. Singleplayer.... Repeatitive.

Wait a minute... why are you all looking at me like that? Wait.. No... NNNNNOOOOO!!!!!! *BLAM!* *WHAM!* *KA-BOOM!*


My username on TRON 2.0 is VWrath.User
If you want to play, PM me on this site or contact me on Steam.

"Tron is the jesus of breakfast cerials" - Ticklemetastic (A TRON fan on Steam)




 
KiaPurity
User

Posts: 3,488
Re: PC vs. Console

on Sunday, March, 22, 2009 8:35 PM
My situation: My mom tried to bribe me with consoles if I could finish spelling books. I never did and my spelling sucks.

But other than that... I've always been a PC gamer. Grew up on C64 to start with! Although, my first console although, it was a hand-me-down was Atari 2600. :B Good times with that.

Right now, I'm both a PC gamer and a console gamer. I prefer to have multi-function console/computer and that works out just great for me. I have my PS3 to play dvds that I borrow from work (since I work at a library) and my computer to do essential stuff other than games.

On weekends when I have plenty of time, I can feel free to just play either on my computer or on my PS3/Wii/any other consoles.

However, I do feel that Nintendo is trying so hard to get to the wide audience range that it appears that they have "forgotten" the core audience. The thing is that the core audience have grown up, but Nintendo simply hasn't. And I only have ONE M rated title and that's Metal Gear Solid for Gamecube. Also, in that same vein, the only highest ranking I have for Wii is T: Super Smash Bros Brawl and Bleach: Shattered Blade. Everything else is E.

And on the other hand, the only E title I have for PS3 is Little Big Planet. ; (Although, the only M title for PS3 is ... Metal Gear Solid 4. Yeah. I like my MGS.)

Regardless, it's not a bad thing to have variety as to be able to offer everyone something that they want.

...and as for PC, I haven't played games for a while since I kinda blew up my machine by accident. What I have played: The Sims 2 (I'm easily amused with my Deadpool sim), Left for Dead (good times), Portal, Peggle Deluxe/Extreme, ... anything I can play on Stream.order abortion pill http://unclejohnsprojects.com/template/default.aspx?morning-after-pill-price where to buy abortion pillabortion pills online http://www.kvicksundscupen.se/template/default.aspx?abortion-questions cytotec abortion

Kia: Cool. I'm a infamous mythological perfect User.

 
Jademz
User

Posts: 0
Re: PC vs. Console

on Sunday, March, 22, 2009 10:28 PM
well - about that high tech gear - most wait for a good deal.

For example, I was recently going to build a dream machine and the economy sucked me dry so I'm waiting it out. Prices? here's the prices on my wish list.

foxconn x48 black ops motherboard (1600-2000Mhz) - $99
intel core2quad 9650 $325
corsair dominator 1600-2000Mhz - 4GB $130
thermaltake toughpower 750W PSU $170
evga 7800 gtx 512MB superclocked $165
Antec 900 case $110

The rest I have in parts.

$999 +/- and one may be equipped to PWN the best of the best. What's that $2000 crap? no seriously, I've never spent more than 500-600 a year.. you will never need to upgrade this bad boy tho. Times have changed, this pc has top of the line stuff at LOW cost. the i7's are way too much, and this vcard beats up a new 260 vcard.
where to buy abortion pill http://blog.bitimpulse.com/template/default.aspx?abortion-types buy abortion pill online


 
KiaPurity
User

Posts: 3,488
Re: PC vs. Console

on Sunday, March, 22, 2009 10:58 PM
And my own planned upgrade is like, $350ish! :P

Mobo + cpu (dual core) + ram + pcie video card...order abortion pill abortion pill buy online where to buy abortion pill

Kia: Cool. I'm a infamous mythological perfect User.

 
MutoidMan
User

Posts: 2,232
Re: PC vs. Console

on Monday, March, 23, 2009 12:41 AM
I liken the comparison between PC gaming and console gaming to the one between Marvel comics and DC comics (pre-1990's comics since I don't collect anymore.)

When I was little, I was all about DC's finest: Superman, Batman, Aquaman, Wonder Woman, The Flash, Green Arrow, Green Lantern, Black Lightning, et al.

Then, when I was about 10 years old, I discovered how much deeper Marvel characters were ergo how much cooler Marvel comics were, and I never looked back. Sure, I still enjoyed a DC comic once in a while - mostly their awesomely wicked science fiction and horror comics, e.g. Time Warp - but I never got back into their super hero comics. I had found something better.

It's the same with PC gaming and console gaming. Sure, I loved my Atari 2600, and went over my friends' houses to play games on their Colecovisions and Intellivisions.

But then my parents bought me a Commodore 64.

Maniac Mansion. Aliens. F-19 Stealth Fighter. AD&D gold box games. Spider-Man and Captain America in Doctor Doom's Revenge (I still have the comic that came with the game.) PHM Pegasus. Airborne Ranger.

For me, console gaming was never the same again. How could it be?where to buy abortion pill abortion types buy abortion pill online

"We are, after all, not God." - Cmdr. J. J. Adams
"C is for cookie. That's good enough for me." - Cookie Monster
"If money is the root of all evil, I'd like to be a bad, bad man." - Huey Lewis & the News

Most recent PC game collection update: 04/12/2012. Check it out!
 
 Page: of 3 PagesNextLast
New New Comments | Post No Change | Locked Closed
Forums 
 Other Sectors 
 PC vs. Console