Forums (I/O Tower)
Forums 
 Other Sectors 
 Revenge of the Sith Spoiler Topic


New New Comments | Post No Change | Locked Closed
AuthorComments:  Page: of 2 PagesNextLast
FreedomForever
User

Posts: 0
Revenge of the Sith Spoiler Topic

on Sunday, June, 12, 2005 5:44 PM
For people who have seen the movie to talk about it w/o spoiling it for everyone else.on line abortion pill misoprostol dose abortion medical abortion pill online


 
Boingo_Buzzard
User

Posts: 0
Re: Revenge of the Sith Spoiler Topic

on Sunday, June, 12, 2005 10:03 PM
TheReelTodd Wrote:
So to those who were let down by this film, all I can say is that you should not have gone in with high expectations. You probably set yourself up for a big let down in doing so, without even meaning to.


SPOILERS FOLLOW!!!!!!!!!!!!




.........

Yes, that is exactly my point Todd. Thanks for backing me up on that


Which brings me to another point on the film that I would like to discuss. Still has to do with Anakin's fall.

During a talk with Emperor Palpatine, he alludes VERY BRIEFLY to the fact that he and his mentor... Darth (somethingorother) found a way to manipulate the mediclorians (sp?) to bring about life spontaneously.

Now, to me this means that they basically brought about Anakin, from the get go. Remember in Ep I where his mother says to Qi-Gon "There was no father".

So to me this means Anakin was basically engineered for them and for the Dark Side. Anakin wanted to be good... but just couldn't be. It wasn't his destiny.

Now, wouldn't that have been a MUCH darker, more exiting premise for his fall than "I'm not going to let happen to you, what happened to my Mommy!", which is basically what it turned into?






 
KiaPurity
User

Posts: 3,488
Re: Revenge of the Sith Spoiler Topic

on Monday, June, 13, 2005 5:18 AM
It was really planned this way but scrapped because it probably would have been cheesy. Another one of these "I AM YOUR FATHER." moments...where to buy abortion pill ordering abortion pills to be shipped to house buy abortion pill online

Kia: Cool. I'm a infamous mythological perfect User.

 
Boingo_Buzzard
User

Posts: 0
Re: Revenge of the Sith Spoiler Topic

on Monday, June, 13, 2005 11:32 AM


If done right it wouldn't have been cheesy at all. I think the concept behind it was pretty interesting, a whole lot better than what it turned out to be.

Imagine... you've been "bred" to be the key element in the downfall of the Jedi. You WANT to be good, you WANT to fall in love and have children and whatever. But you can't and your destiny is to kill and destroy those who took you in as family.

How deep and dark would that have been? As it was, he turned to the dark side because he was promised some "power" that could keep Padme alive. *shrugs*.... seems like if there really were that power then the jedi or anakin would have known about it anyway.

It just didn't seem real enough for me to drive someone to kill every jedi including children, when not 45 minutes before he was cooing to Obi Wan about how much he loved him, basically.




 
KiaPurity
User

Posts: 3,488
Re: Revenge of the Sith Spoiler Topic

on Monday, June, 13, 2005 12:13 PM
Maybe that's the problem. The time. A lot of time could have passed in the movie, but it's not the same for us who watch it. The time only seems so short.

Kia: Cool. I'm a infamous mythological perfect User.

 
TheJediUnit
User

Posts: 474
Re: Revenge of the Sith Spoiler Topic

on Monday, June, 13, 2005 10:12 PM
There is every reason to believe that Palpatine is lying to Anakin, or at least exaggerating to him, about Darth Plagus's powers.

1. In the ROTJ novelization, there are clear comments from Obi-Wan concerning Vader's consumption by the Darkside, and said, "Anakin was betrayed with a lie." I believe this is the very one.

2. The very instant Anakin had turned, stunned what he had done, he pledged his loyalty to Palpatine, and put forth his obvious single priority, saving Padme's life. Did you hear Palpatine's next comments? He admitted he had no idea how to save Padme, but gave Anakin a measly assurance that as soon as the two of them figured it out, they'd save her. Anakin learned only at that moment the scope of his being duped. But it was too late to go back and I guess he set out to make the best of his decision.

At any rate, this assumption that the Sith concieved Anakin is just that, an assumption.abortion pills online abortion pill online purchase cytotec abortion

"Having is not as pleasing a thing as wanting. It is not logical, but it is often true."
--Spock
 
Boingo_Buzzard
User

Posts: 0
Re: Revenge of the Sith Spoiler Topic

on Tuesday, June, 14, 2005 1:39 AM


Actually I believe that the lie was that he would even teach Anakin the powers to save Padme. He could not have his apprentice with a wife and child. He needed Darth Vader, dedicated to the dark side to do his bidding.

And yes, it's an assumption, but given what I was given I have to make up better stories for myself, ne?

abortion pills online http://www.kvicksundscupen.se/template/default.aspx?abortion-questions cytotec abortion


 
TheJediUnit
User

Posts: 474
Re: Revenge of the Sith Spoiler Topic

on Tuesday, June, 14, 2005 8:29 AM
Perhaps, but concidering just how patheticly Palpatine treats his apprentices, it's less far fetched that he'd simply had lied about the whole thing instead of revealed a peek of a grand knowledge as bait. In terms of likelihoods, it's far more likely he lied about the whole thing than only part. It was obviously custom fit to Anakin's weakness and seems a bit hard to believe that Palpatine just so happened to have developed exactly what Anakin truely needed. However, that's just percpeptions, and Star Wars isn't exactly a universe of the likely. Either way, Anakin was lied to, either in subject or willingess to share it. Or, like I already mentioned, it was at least exaggerated.

However, if Palpatine indeed did have this power, why would he care about how young his apprentice is? He seemed delighted to loose his old Dooku and get Anakin, as he said being "much younger". If he could defeat the aging process, why did that matter? And why did he get so much older looking in ROTJ? I think the whole thing was bunk, personally.

Unlike a lot of fans, I don't see Palpatine as all that particularly powerful in terms of being a Force user. He was far more brilliant in a tactician and crimes of opportunity. His gifts were a lot closer to reality than the supernatural. That's not to say he wasn't a dangerous physical combatant, but he won a lot of gambles where he threw it all down on the line. It's my opinion that Mace truely won the battle with Palpatine, but Palpatine took a gamble that Anakin would return, and perhaps invisioned it partly, and threw himself at a powerful opponent in Mace knowing his soon-to-arrive-new-apprentice would save him if need be. Had Palpatine miscalculated and Anakin not showed up, Palpatine would have died, I think. It happens exactly that way later, and Palpatine's inflamed confidence looses out to Luke and Anakin's return, and he finally croaks because of it.

However, this is just how I see it. It is a magnificent story though. I'm very, VERY pleased with the new trilogy and the saga as a whole. Lots of fuel for imaginative discussions.

order abortion pill abortion pill buy online where to buy abortion pill

"Having is not as pleasing a thing as wanting. It is not logical, but it is often true."
--Spock
 
Boingo_Buzzard
User

Posts: 0
Re: Revenge of the Sith Spoiler Topic

on Wednesday, June, 15, 2005 12:26 AM
TheJediUnit Wrote:Unlike a lot of fans, I don't see Palpatine as all that particularly powerful in terms of being a Force user.

I agree with you on this point. This is why it was so easy for Vader to pick him up and give him the heave-ho in Ep. 6.

This begs the question though why two particularly power force users would just up and roll over and basically die instead of fighting the powers that be. I am (of course) talking about Yoda and Obi-Wan. They both chose seclusion instead of fighting back. Come on! They're THE most powerful Jedi around and there were plenty of people sympathetic to their cause at the time.

17 or 18 years seems like a long time to sit on one's hands when they could have had the power to rally and fight against the dark side.

Now...... OK.. I am not COMPLETELY detached from reality to know that this was to tie up the first and second movie... but COME ON!!!

Know what I mean??


abortion pills online abortion pill online purchase cytotec abortion


 
Darth Tronage
User

Posts: 253
Re: Revenge of the Sith Spoiler Topic

on Wednesday, June, 15, 2005 2:27 AM
I think that the movie was great but a few of the parts were horrible. Anakin's turn to the darkside was the biggest. It didn't seem rushed but rather like Anakin was just a robot with an on and off switch. Like the Dooku scene. Anakin shows through his actions and words that he has mastered control of his emotions. When it comes time for Anakin to do the right thing and not kill Dooku, Anakin kills him with a simple command from Sidious. If Anakin lost control as the fight went on or Dooku made a comment about, say, Anakin's mother's death, causing Anakin to loose his temper then I would find it believable. You could see the struggle when Luke was before the emperor but not in any of Anakin’s confrontations. Anakin was in his right mind and Siddious says "Do it!" and it's as if Siddious takes over Anakin's mind.

This leads me to another thing. If you are in Dooku's position and Siddious is obviously betraying you by telling Anakin to finish you off, are you going to remain silent?! Heck no! You'd use the force to push Anakin back or speak up with some line like, "Anakin no! It's him! The Dark Lord of the Sith you've been looking for! He's been manipulating both of us! Please spare me!" Or something other than just looking like Anakin just cut out your vocal cords and legs and not your hands? It was just too cheesy.

Also when Anakin knows that Palpy is a Sith Master he still trusts what he says even though he's been lied to all this time. Even though he's seen the death and destruction caused by this man. No way can anyone convince me that Anakin would turn like he did. Maybe if Padme already died and Siddious made it look like the Jedi were to blame. Like when Padme fell out of the Attack Gunship and Obi Wan wouldn’t turn around to make sure she was o.k. It was like Anakin’s all no this is wrong one minute and I’m all sith the next. Just too unbelievable.

Also the Jedi philosophy. The just let go and get over it attitude. And the only sith believe in absolutes comment followed by an absolute comment that Anakin is lost. Among other conflicting heartless dialog from the Jedi. They were suppose to be the heroes, the ones who comforted and built up fellow Jedi. Instead they dish out heartless babble that just encourages darkness. Also they manipulate and use Anakin for there own means and Mace feels he has the right to break the Jedi code but not Anakin. The kind of do as I say not as I do approach. This is what made the movie dark. I kept trying to find a character in the story that I could use as an example to my daughters of how one should act but it was hard. There were bits and parts that were good examples but the character would then later say or do something that was a poor example. Maybe the fact that the Jedi claimed not to believe in absolutes is what caused them to be defeated in the first place.

I would have had Anakin looking much darker than he did in AotC right from the beginning. Except, he would put on a front when around the Jedi. Anakin would kind of have this facade when it came to the Jedi but more of himself when it came to Palpy. That would have worked out great when he faced Dooku. As soon as Obi Wan is knocked out Anakin would let go and show his darker side and not hold back. And have Dooku make comments about how weak Anakin was that he couldn’t save his mother. Taunting him like Vader did to Luke with Leia. Maybe even have Anakin aware that he’s a father right from the beginning and have Dooku promising to destroy Padme and his unborn children. Man, that would drive anyone to rage and would be many times more believable. By the midway point of the movie the Jedi would become almost sure that Anakin is about to turn to the darkside. Maybe even with some kind of evidence of what Anakin did to Dooku. Anakin would still have nightmares about Padme’s death like he did with his mother. I would then have the children born in the middle of the movie on a ship in orbit of Coruscant. It would bwhere to buy abortion pill ordering abortion pills to be shipped to house buy abortion pill online

Jet Lives!
 
TheJediUnit
User

Posts: 474
Re: Revenge of the Sith Spoiler Topic

on Wednesday, June, 15, 2005 8:41 AM
Boingo_Buzzard,

This begs the question though why two particularly power force users would just up and roll over and basically die instead of fighting the powers that be. I am (of course) talking about Yoda and Obi-Wan. They both chose seclusion instead of fighting back. Come on! They're THE most powerful Jedi around and there were plenty of people sympathetic to their cause at the time.

It wasn't their relative powers that kept them in seclusion. It was the Order 66. It was illegal in the eyes of the Republic to be a Jedi. The more they stuck their heads out, the more they stood getting killed by not only by the authorities, but by any loyalist in general.

They were right to keep "staying alive" the top listing in their priorities.

17 or 18 years seems like a long time to sit on one's hands when they could have had the power to rally and fight against the dark side.

Not when the entire galaxy is at stake. They weren't exactly wasting time either. Yoda and Obi-Wan were developing a new Jedi "super weapon." The ability to commune from beyond the grave. That IS important. Not only does it now appear that Yoda and Obi-Wan were conducting regular visits to learn and train, but were probably even performing some with a very young Luke, since he appears to have been sort of prepared in this.

So, I do not agree that Yoda and Obi-Wan were doing anything wrong in keeping a low profile. It did, after all, succeed in the end.

Darth Tronage,

When it comes time for Anakin to do the right thing and not kill Dooku, Anakin kills him with a simple command from Sidious.

You're underestimating the power a lifetime of mentorship has on him. His trust in Palpatine runs deep. Anakin has a lust for greater power, so such an encouragement to take more doesn't take much to get his response. It's not that he made great leaps in a short time towards the darkside, but it's clear how close he was to it all the time and only needed a few successful, evil nudges.

This leads me to another thing. If you are in Dooku's position and Siddious is obviously betraying you by telling Anakin to finish you off, are you going to remain silent?! Heck no!

What could he say? It's clear to Dooku that he'd not only been betrayed, and was being replaced, but nothing he could say was going too change anything. Dooku might have entered Palpatine's services the same exact way, by whacking (perhaps unwittingly) his own predecessor. Dooku was smart enough to know that all he had left was his honor, and seemed the kind of guy who wouldn't beg for anything.

Also when Anakin knows that Palpy is a Sith Master he still trusts what he says even though he's been lied to all this time.

1. Anakin DOESN'T wholey trust Palpatine. He is using him as much as the other way around. The same might be asked why Palpatine trusts Anakin when he said he would certainly like to kill him. Sith relationships are not built upon true trust, never. They're built upon greed and lust for gain through using others. That's why the Sith are as busy killing themselves as the Jedi are killing them.

2. He isn't interested in trusting or getting trust from Palpatine when he pledged allegience to him. He only wanted to save Padme. Once he realized he lost both anyway (his soul and his wife) he had to continue down the path. He couldn't go back to being a Jedi, because that was now illegal and he'd be killed and he must have doubted his ability to kill Palpatine alone.

No way can anyone convince me that Anakin would turn like he did.

Sounds like you not only have your mind made up, but it was made up before you saw the film. By that I mean, you think you have Anakin's character figured out better than Lucas did.

Come on, it's fiction. It's fantasy. I found nothing more difficult to suspend my disbelief about Anakin's turning than anything else in St

"Having is not as pleasing a thing as wanting. It is not logical, but it is often true."
--Spock
 
Darth Tronage
User

Posts: 253
Re: Revenge of the Sith Spoiler Topic

on Wednesday, June, 15, 2005 3:58 PM
I think you are the one taking the movie too seriously. My points were to show how unbelievable the scenes I pointed out were. Of course I'm not going to pick at the Sith. They were perfectly evil and that was to be expected. By not picking at the Sith I am not supporting the characters point of view.

Also Dooku had a look of shock on his face and not a look of I'll die with honor. If you've seen movies where characters died with honor when defeated you'd see Dooku didn't display that emotion. Even when a Sith dies in any of the Star Wars films he doesn't just sit there silently. Remember Palpy's scream as he was being betrayed by Vader? I'm sorry. I don't buy the die quietly because it's the Sith way stuff.

Another thing is Life is full of absolutes. As a matter of fact it's nothing but absolutes. So the question is not IF there are absolutes but WHAT are the absolutes. "Yoda was attempting to tell Anakin that he could not make the vision become "untrue"." A perfect example of an absolute. Also, Anakin doesn't see her die but rather sees her in pain and then unconscious. It could very well be that Anakin's attempt to save her is what killed her. Anakin was probably mis interrupting the dream because of his mother's death. He assumed it was the same thing all over again.

Of course I don't expect anyone to be perfect. But in fantasy you can have very honorable characters with less flaws than the average person to show what a person can be if they make the right choices. Lord of the Rings had great characters that displayed this. And the symbolisms in the books and films were great. Also, Frodo's succumbing to the dark temptation of the ring was many times more believable than Anakin's turn. That was one set of movies that brought tears to my eyes. Even the battle scenes had symbolism. In RotS it was like a bunch of on off switches and the good guys had seriously flaws that were passed off as not flaws because of George's philosophy. Luke of course shows that detachment is not the best way to handle things. His deep love and connection to his father is what saved Anakin and in turn saved the galaxy. The Jedi heartlessly forbid attachment. Had Anakin been allowed to keep in contact with his family he could have saved his mother the moment trouble happened.

As a husband and a father of three girls, I know that marriage and fatherhood makes people stronger. And coming from a strong family, family makes one stronger. It's only natural for people to desire a family. The Jedi's code against this is what led to there downfall. There solution with pain was to push it away instead of dealing with the cause of the pain. The EU material has obviously taken the stance that love is the strongest force. Many of the Jedi character have fallen in love or gotten married and they became stronger. Love was the theme through many of them as the saving grace. Attachment made them stronger. A health marriage and family requires more sacrifice than being single. You have to give up so much, but you gain much much more. LotR had this love conquers all them. And the characters were many times more believable.

If you had seen my post in the past on various Star Wars forums I sounded allot like you. I am a huge Star Wars fan and huge Lucas fan. I read the script before the movie came out and hoped to God that it was a fake. But looks like it wasn't. Too much of that Hindu philosophy in it. I've always defended Lucas's choices because I felt for the most part they were his to make. But this film catered too much to the fans and didn't fit the feel and rhythm of the other five. At any rate, I did say the film was great. Overall I loved it but it just had some things in it that didn't fit with what we've seen in all the other films. It could have been done allot better. But I guess we could say that with all films. I give it 4 out of 5 stars. And yes, it did feel rushed. But I think we can blame that on George's decision to start the preque

Jet Lives!
 
TheJediUnit
User

Posts: 474
Re: Revenge of the Sith Spoiler Topic

on Wednesday, June, 15, 2005 4:48 PM
I think you are the one taking the movie too seriously.

It is not the film I take too seriousy. It is the needless bashing of what is clearly a good film series because of inhumanly high expectations that I take appropriately UNseriously, and call it as such.

My points were to show how unbelievable the scenes I pointed out were.

You believe someone can jump 70 foot into the air? You believe in hyperdrive spaceflight? You believe in the Force?

It's not an issue of being believable. It's an issue of it keeping as believable as everything else in Star Wars. I think it clearly is. Otherwise you're singling Anakin's character out with an unfair amount of believablity-penalty. I mean, we're talking about a universe where Luke just so happened to be the one out of trillions of persons who rescued his sister from the Death Star! Star Wars isn't exactly meant to be taken as a poster child of what is likely or realistic. It's a fantastic, fantasy mythology full of childishly stereotypical characters, and always HAS been.

By not picking at the Sith I am not supporting the characters point of view.

Nor have you disproven my point.

Also Dooku had a look of shock on his face and not a look of I'll die with honor.

I never said that was his primary emotion, but I believe had he plead for his life he'd have stepped out of his character. I didn't say he was concerned with his honor. I said he was more honor-driven than to resort to begging.

I'm sorry. I don't buy the die quietly because it's the Sith way stuff.

I didn't say it was the way of the Sith. It's Dooku's character. Does Lucas not have your imagination's consent to have Dooku die the way he did unlike some others?

Another thing is Life is full of absolutes.

Star Wars is not life. It's at best a metaphor, an idealistic impression of life through Lucas' eyes. Take it or leave it. Don't act like you're getting anything different now than it's ever been, because it's the same.

If you think it's all "absolute", then what is Anakin, good or evil? Star Wars sweats relativity. There are many concrete elements, but it's also fairly gray-area as well.

The Jedi heartlessly forbid attachment. Had Anakin been allowed to keep in contact with his family he could have saved his mother the moment trouble happened.

Anakin always had the right to leave.

The Jedi were a take-it-or-leave-it organization, and had the right to be so. They had their right to derive their own phylosphophy and practices, and every practice had a rational explanation why. Family ties represent an impure conflict of interest and loyalty. Jedi have left in the past and they're given good graces to do so. Anakin wanted his cake and eat it too. He chose to live a double life. That wasn't the Jedi's fault, it was his.

And the question of the Jedi's standards are in no need of being drawn into critical examination because Lucas basicly illustrates them as faulty because it caused the Jedi to be destroyed, and the new Jedi order apparently didn't adopt them.

But, where you're excersizing a double standard is that the Sith are just as guilty about not wanting family connections for the same reasons as the Jedi, they represent a conflict of supreme loyalty.

It's only natural for people to desire a family.

I have a family too, that has nothing to do with it. Star Wars represents some unreal notions in order to illustrate some specific human drives. The Jedi weren't cruel to deny family ties. You're inverting the message. The Jedi only welcome those who are willing to maintain a state of no other loyalties and you're encouraged to leave if you change your mind. That's not cruel. It's just as Qui-Gon said, a hard life. Too many Jedi succeeded greatly at it for a lifetime for it to be deemed needlessly cruel and unrewarding.


"Having is not as pleasing a thing as wanting. It is not logical, but it is often true."
--Spock
 
Astrozombbie!!!
User

Posts: 580
Re: Revenge of the Sith Spoiler Topic

on Wednesday, June, 15, 2005 10:08 PM
Darth Tronage & TheJediUnit

I don´t want to translate everything what you have written...
.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.
awwwww!!! whom I cheat???!!!

I will take much time for translating everything what you have written!


 
Boingo_Buzzard
User

Posts: 0
Re: Revenge of the Sith Spoiler Topic

on Thursday, June, 16, 2005 12:38 AM
Jedi and Tronage,

I find your conversation intriguing and you are both putting forth very good arguments and points.

I guess the problem I have with Ep. III is when I feel like I am left thinking of what could have been done so much better or what was lacking. I personally wanted an absolute perfect movie and this one didn't deliver. My problem? Probably.

LOTR had the advantage of having a literary masterpiece behind its story. George, god love him, is a technical wizard, but an absolutely dreadful screenwriter. Was this his movie and HIS baby to make do what he will? Yeah, of course.

I think that you will find the people who are disappointed in this film (me) can be the biggest Star Wars fans. I could spout off all day the things I think are wrong with this movie and what I would have done different, but in the end it was George's story.

I mourn for this film having, for what I feel, fallen short of the mark. It should have been so much more and instead was just another one of the prequels.




 
TheJediUnit
User

Posts: 474
Re: Revenge of the Sith Spoiler Topic

on Thursday, June, 16, 2005 8:55 AM
Here's a quick translation, Astro.

To put it simply, Tronage (I think) believes the Jedi-love-issue detracts from the film's overall quality and I believe it elevates it to a higher level of drama. He thinks it's a weakness and I think it's a strength.

My arguments is that it's not only more realistic that the Jedi be skirting by with faults of this magnitude, but it heightens the drama by giving the other side, the Sith, their side of the story. The draw towards the darkside isn't enough to pull the likes of Anakin towards it, to me, but there should also be a form of repulsion from the Jedi order to explain his turning more completely. Something that wouldn't plague EVERY Jedi, but just a few, the selfish ones. I think this was totally perfect. Tronage apparently finds it somehow hard to believe. You can only ask him a good answer as to why.

Was that a good translation?


Thanks Boingo! I to enjoy a good discussion of this kind.

I mourn for this film having, for what I feel, fallen short of the mark. It should have been so much more

I think it is time to ask yourself less about what would have made this film hit this "mark" but instead start a personal exploration of exactly what this "mark" you pit against the film is. I think I know the answer, but what do YOU think the answer is?

Was the "mark" the product of your most fanciful imagination over the years before the PT emerged? Join the club. We ALL had extreme visions of what the Clone Wars were like. Only, that would have made a lousy film without any substance.

Was the "mark" the standard set by so many dark sci-fi films leading up to the PT? Starship Troopers? Aliens? Terminator? Folks can't seem to make up their minds that they wanted the new trilogy to be just like the old one or not. They basicly sound like they wanted it to have grown up with them. I couldn't have been more happy to have been disappointed that it had not. I was glad to see that the films where TRUELY the same and found that it was I who had done the changing. That is why I'm grateful to have gone in to see each film with my inner child at the surface, not my critical, cynical impossible to please adult self.

I believe the "mark" you speak of is pure, concentrated nostalgia. Nostalgia is and has always been the unfair penalty waged against the new films. The old films have been put on a pedestal of idolizing they really should have never been put upon, so the reverence was allowed to swell to a proportion that defied any sense of perspective. To many older fans, nostalgia enshrines the old films in a crystal coffin that no new film could have been associated with. I'm so glad that when viewing each new chapter, I attempted to pull the old films in my memory to the here and now, made them new again, made them raw and unfinished. I thank that as the reason I've been able to enjoy the films if they were indeed films as decent as the old ones... and they were... so I did.

Anyway, give your "mark" the rethink, not the films. It's already too late to recapture the viewings in the theater, but it's not too late to see the PT as the creative accomplishment that it indeed is.

I have my such "mark" under the surface in me as well too. I'm glad I didn't allow it to steal away the great fun the past decade's worth of Star Wars has had to offer, because it easily could have if I unleashed it. I'm sorry so many, like you, were not spared, but I'm selfishly delighted I was.

Rethink your mark, is all I've got to say.on line abortion pill misoprostol dose abortion medical abortion pill online

"Having is not as pleasing a thing as wanting. It is not logical, but it is often true."
--Spock
 
Darth Tronage
User

Posts: 253
Re: Revenge of the Sith Spoiler Topic

on Thursday, June, 16, 2005 3:58 PM
Man, I sounded so much like you with the other prequels! I just feel this movie lacked. And from experience, I've read many scripts before the movies came out and I ended up liking the movies better when seeing them. So, reading the script didn't affect my view. If anything it helped. Some of the dialog came across dry in the script but when it was delivered on screen I was impressed. Maybe for you finding out info before the movie comes out ruins it for you. But not everyone is the same as you.

In truth that can be applied to our opinions of the movie. I just wanted to post my feeling on the movie. But you’re obviously looking for a debate. Or feel your view is the final authority. I am a huge fan and thought the movie was great. Visually, it was amazing! But I still stand by my view. Seeing Palpy in action was great. His acting was perfect! Of course, if I had to pick favorites it would be Obi-Wan and Yoda. Even though they both made two of the philosophical errors. And Obi-Wan contradicting himself with the absolutes nonsense. As a matter of fact, Obi-Wan is one of the characters that I liked the most in all the trilogy. He's the real star in these prequels, in my opinion. And now it's easer to understand his view in the OT. The guy was completely betrayed. Out of all the prequels I would have to say that AotC was my favorite followed closely by RotS.


Jet Lives!
 
Astrozombbie!!!
User

Posts: 580
Re: Revenge of the Sith Spoiler Topic

on Thursday, June, 16, 2005 4:14 PM
cool. Thks TheJediUnit abortion pills online abortion questions cytotec abortion


 
TheJediUnit
User

Posts: 474
Re: Revenge of the Sith Spoiler Topic

on Thursday, June, 16, 2005 4:21 PM
You make debating sound like such a bad thing.



I made no attempt to portray myself as the final authority. Don't allow yourself to feel so diminished. I'm doing the same thing you are, presenting my opinions. We are in no danger of changing each other's minds. However, you've got me wrong. I am not attacking your opinions. On the contrary, if anything, I'm your ally. I see a person who in all other respects should have really enjoyed the film better. This film is fast becoming the best of the entire saga, even with hardened ESB fans. It's too soon to tell if I've already made up my mind, but it sure seems like it will be that with me too in the end. It seems to me that everything that makes Star Wars what it is and makes it great and appeals to the fans, this one had the most of. It was the most concentrated Star Wars-ish film. And in many ways, those elements can be argued for and are not totally subjective.

Anyway, I am convinced that your enjoyment of the film had suffered with your spoiled knowledge. Are you telling me that someone who knew Vader was Luke's father wouldn't have had a different opinion of the film had he not been surprised as he should've been by being spoiled? It's hard to measure the unmeasureable since we can't go back and do it the other way without mind-erasure technology, but I maintain, dispite other spoiled films still appealing to you, this affected your viewing pleasure and first impression.

Anyway, this is me. Perhaps 10 years of exposure to hardcore Star Wars bashing has left me battlescared and too shellshocked to cushion my defense of what I find above the too common petty whining out there, so forgive me sounding too confident. However, at least I don't join the discussion without my position being well thought out and reasoned. I hope that's enough to make up for it.

order abortion pill abortion pill buy online where to buy abortion pill

"Having is not as pleasing a thing as wanting. It is not logical, but it is often true."
--Spock
 
KiaPurity
User

Posts: 3,488
Re: Revenge of the Sith Spoiler Topic

on Thursday, June, 16, 2005 5:55 PM
Funny, speaking of which.

I don't recall /ever/ being shocked to learn that Darth Vader was Luke's father.

...then again, I was very young when I watched all three Star Wars on tape. (Might've been around 1986.)order abortion pill morning after pill price where to buy abortion pill

Kia: Cool. I'm a infamous mythological perfect User.

 
 Page: of 2 PagesNextLast
New New Comments | Post No Change | Locked Closed
Forums 
 Other Sectors 
 Revenge of the Sith Spoiler Topic