Click Here.order abortion pill abortion pill buy online where to buy abortion pill

I've been hearing about that law. It's too vague so it'll be thrown out. =/

And besides, most of the annoyances tend to come from younger children... ^^; People wouldn't be thrilled with the idea of putting children in jail... so the law really doesn't make sense. =/ Also, what some people find annoying, others don't.

Now, if it was narrowed down to specifically target spammers, stalkers and harrassers... maybe it'd be ok. (I'm not really sure on this one.)

My head just hurts so much from the law.abortion pills online abortion pill online purchase cytotec abortion

This law wont last long. Do you realize how flooded our local police depts. would be if they really are going to bring someone in just for posting some dumb comment on a blog.

Polotics have to be the dumbest people in our country... (and I'm even dumber cause I can't spell)...


I'M GOING TO JAIL!!!!!!!!! Weeeeeee!!!!!order abortion pill morning after pill price where to buy abortion pill

Sketch Wrote:*Walks up to DaveTron and extends his finger...* *Poke, poke, poke, poke, poke, poke, poke, poke, poke, poke, poke, poke, poke, poke, poke, poke, poke, poke, poke, poke, poke, poke, poke, poke, poke, poke, poke, poke, poke, poke, poke, poke, poke, poke, poke, poke, poke, poke, poke, poke, poke, poke, poke, poke, poke, poke, poke, poke, poke, poke, poke, poke, poke, poke, poke, poke, poke, poke, poke, poke, poke, poke, poke, poke, poke, poke, poke, poke, poke, poke, poke, poke, poke, poke, poke, poke, poke, poke, poke, poke, poke, poke, poke, poke, poke, poke, poke, poke, poke, poke, poke, poke, poke, poke, poke, poke, poke, poke, poke, poke, poke, poke, poke, poke, poke, poke, poke, poke, poke, poke, poke, poke* I'm commiting a crime! *Doesn't notice the security guard walking up behind him.* This is a stupid law.

My ICPs are coming for your digital persona too! I'll teach you to poke me!

...that's...a little wierd...

I can see that maybe that the annoyance law may be for Spam but how far can this actually be taken before you slide down too far on that slippery slope? Because of how vague that law is, if I were in America, I could easily get my sis in trouble when she annoys me online (Of course, not that I want to. She's my sis and younger sis seem to get great pleasure out of annoying their older counterpart anyways.) so if someone took it to that point, we'd have a lot of annoying siblings in jail or something which is just not cool. I mean, I can only see two people going to court, one pointing ever so dramatically to the other and say "THIS PERSON IS ANNOYING ONLINE! THEY POST TOO MANY SMART THINGS AND THAT'S ANNOYING" Other "annoying" person: "But I don't see how that can be annoying. I wasn't out to annoy you with them. I was just posting the solution to world hunger" *Gets sent to jail for being "annoying"* Okay.... maybe not quite that extreme, but you know where I'm going. That law despritally needs to be re-written or at least define what is considered annoying (Ei: Spam). Besides, we have no idea what annoys everyone anyways. And if we followed that law as it was written, then everyone would be in jail because what you might do/say online that isn't annoying to most other people, will be annoying to a few. I mean there are people who annoy me online (While it's not intentional. Right now, my sis and I are annoyed with this one person at some art site who is being a main page (Explicative) who's only clame to fame is that the only thing she draws and colours is char from popular anime to grab attention and quite a few people love her. She even has two fan clubs following her around. The admin of that site doesn't even have one fan club! But yeah, while it's not intetional and I don't think she means to annoy people, she still does!) but I think it's pretty extreme to throw her in jail. But yeah. The law is way too vague and extremist. It's times like these that being Canadian comes in handy and we don't have to worry about that law.

~Kamui.EXE

Boingo_Buzzard Wrote: Frankly, I see an upside to this. I just went to a web site that had playstation cover images on it, and was victim of a FULL PAGE ad, that disabled the close window button, started playing a LOUD obnoxious voice over and could only be closed through the task manager. If the people who designed and sent that to me could do some jail time I would not shed a tear.

Have you ever been to a Porn Site that does that? You click on a link, and the next thing you know there is a voice blaring from your speakers going "Oooh baby, are you looking for hot action?". Try explaining that to your wife!

Lucky for me, mine doesn't care as long as I don't show it to her.order abortion pill abortion pill buy online where to buy abortion pill

DaveTRON Wrote:Try explaining that to your wife!

I suggest going to overseas porn websites, that way they can yell out whatever they want in a foreign language, and you're covered.

lol.... that really was a funny comment (edited for Bingo and Dave).... :Pwhere to buy abortion pill ordering abortion pills to be shipped to house buy abortion pill online

I don't think anyone should really get concerned about this "law". I've enjoyed people's humorous takes on things though!

I'm not exactly sure how or why this law was put in to place. There must have been something specific in mind that would make this law useful should whatever those circumstances are take place. But the law seems to read a bit vague (according to the article) and as the writer of the article pointed out, there are potentially very dumb ways this law might be translated.

A couple of things to take in to account:

First, this story was written with the intention of getting people all concerned about something ridiculous, like simply being annoying and ending up in jail for it. That will not happen - at least not in the ways the story spells out. What court in their right mind (or left mind as well) would put someone in jail for the stupid scenarios implied in the story? It ain't gonna happen. People won't stand for it and the politicians won't back it up if it pisses off the voters.

Second, the only time this law would ever realistically be used is when whatever those specific events that lead to it's being drafted came in to play. The law might be used as a warning shot to people who are more than crossing lines with their poor internet practices. The law will not be used to shut down simple "annoying web sites" or anything like that, as in "I'm annoyed that this web site exists" and related things. There is freedom of speech in this country and that ain't going away.

I can be down-right annoying myself - in person or over the inetnet. I do not fear for a single micro cycle going to jail for my behavior. Not at all. Because I am not "annoying" in malicious or harmful ways that this law was intended to shut down, nor are most "annoying" people.

If you want to be afraid of the "interpretations" that might be made of this law - go right ahead. Do with your time as you wish. As for me, I've got better things to do with my time than worry about vaguely written laws that some journalists use to spin a little fear in to their readers with.

Life is short. Relax and ENJOY it.