I know this is gonna sound nuts, but when I watch T:L with one eye closed, it helps me a LOT to "see" the movie in 3D. Of course it also helped that I learned to see it in 3D after seeing it that way in the theaters about, oh, at least TEN times. But it's a lot easier to imagine it in #D with one eye shut. I do not know why this is, but try it. order abortion pill abortion pill buy online where to buy abortion pill

Right. And i daresay the "3-D effect" is your brain working overtime to try to recreate a scene you know is 3-D even though your depth perception is now defunct. It probably does over-do it.

The fact that it seems so pronounced may be a matter of novelty as well? If you saw with one eye all the time, I bet it wouldn't take long for the feeling that objects seem "more" 3-D to fade, and once you were seeing with two eyes again, that indeed would seem to "pop" now.

Or, it could just simply be that what we perceive as "3-D" in movies and pictures is actually an attempt to make something 2-D appear 3-D, and we are used to the way that looks. In which case, yes, our brain's attempt to make an image we see in 2-D (because of a lack of depth perception) still appear 3-D is exactly the same effect.

After all, 3-D is largely just a way of artificially doing what our eyes and mind do anyway, right? Take an image from two slightly-different vantage points and combine that information into one image so we can perceive an object's shape/distance/etc. as a 3-D object rather than something flat. I think that's the way 3-D works, though it may be more advanced these days and I'm not familiar with how the technology works. But if you've ever had a "3-D" comic book and the red-and-blue glasses, you'll notice that how it works is that you have identical images, one in red and one in blue, with one shifted just slightly from the other. So when you put your red-and-blue glasses on, each eye perceives only the image that ISN'T in the color it's looking through, and those two images combine just as the two vantage points from your eyes would on a true 3-D object, and voila... (when I was a kid I'd also play around with moving the glasses in front of my eyes from one side to the other,which made the image appear to be moving back and forth, which was fun too.)abortion pills online abortion pill online purchase cytotec abortion

Quite a few years ago there was a charity telethon in the UK on the BBC. It was either Children in Need or Red Nose Day.. can't quite remember.

There was a big fuss about certain filmed sections being in full colour 3d. All you needed was a pair of cardboard glasses with cellophane lenses. One lense was clear and one was darkened.

The 3d did seem to work on normal TV's. It was quite impressive.

Afterwards it was explained that the 3d was created by having the camera continually moving. I'm not sure if the direction of the camera mattered.

Apparently, when having one lense clear and one lense shaded, the signal from one eye is processed more slowly than the other eye. This, along with the motion of the picture on the screen, created a convincing 3d effect.

It was mentioned that there was nothing special with the filming apart from the continuous camera panning. The 3d effect would happen with anything on TV, as long as the glasses were being worn and there was camera panning from one side to the other. The faux 3d effect would vanish as soon as motion stopped.

So if you can get or make some similar glasses (sunglasses minus one lense?) maybe that's worth a shot