I'd already heard about the 3-D part . . . not sure what to think of that.

But 2011 now? Yikes. I hope that means they're taking extra time to make it good. But then again, this is Disney we're talking about.

So when will they do a greenlight announcement? This stops just short of confirming for sure that the sequel is a go.

order abortion pill abortion pill buy online where to buy abortion pill

3D is fine, and 2011 isn't that far away. Not in terms of movie development. However, in terms of technological and social trends, it's ages. As the film is likely to attempt to mirror modern technology and how it influences society overtly, this could become problematic.abortion pills online abortion questions cytotec abortion

I dig the 3D thing a lot. Personally, I wish pretty much entertainment would be available in 3D - ESPECIALLY games.

I think TRON will translate well in to 3D because of the nature of what TRON is. I'd love the opportunity to see the original film in 3D. It doesn't have to be popping out at me so I feel like a reco is going to smack me in the face - I just want to see the full world in all its 3D glory.

We live in 3D and experience life in 3D. To look in upon our fiction friends (or real events as in documentaries, etc.) in full 3D would bring things that much closer to our own reality, or so that's my take on it in a nutshell.

Got a little off subject there.

Ok, TRON in 3D works for me. TRON in 2011 is a bit further away than I was expecting, but it will have to do. I just hope they don't screw it up. This is Disney and we all know the angle they love to play these days. My main question is will they actually promote this new TRON film? My memory of the promotion of the original TRON was that it was promoted very poorly. I really didn't care for the TV spots I saw for it as a kid... and don't remember seeing them often. The advertisements for TRON didn't seem to embody the film much. They were weak, IMO. TRON 2.0 - we all know how well Disney DIDN'T promote that.

I'll try to stay positive about it for now. I tend to get overprotective when it comes to fictional characters and worlds that I know and love... and the potential for them to be pooped on by today's entertainment industry.

where to buy abortion pill abortion types buy abortion pill online

Traahn Wrote:We'll see Lurkinghorror. Tron came out in 1982 and it took time to develop. But was it outdated by the time it was released? Hardly.

Actually, I'd say it was. The first half of 1982 gave us the single, Pac-Man fever. Which, while a hit, gives a strong indication of how played out arcade pop-culture had become. The video game industry had yet to prove it's longevity, and the general populace was beginning to grow weary of the fad aspect. From a marketing perspective, Tron would have fared much better if it had been released when initially conceived.

It's even more difficult for material to remain socially relevant in this day and age. I assume the new film will focus on the modern world of technology rather overtly. There will be direct parallels to the internet and to online gaming and digital identity. The popular delivery methods of gaming and content are quite mercurial in today's society, and the general audience, now far more familiar with computer terminology than those of us back in 1982, will be considerably less forgiving over overt representation.order abortion pill abortion pill buy online where to buy abortion pill

I really hope that the story really keeps the theme of the original and TRON 2.0. This is what every TRON movie/game should have:

-Hacker/Programmer is unwillingly digitized into the world of the computer.
-Lots of irony
-Violence
-No moral
-Epic final battles
-Electronicly synthesised soundtrack
-Serious tone
-Something to do with corperate issues

If you watch and then play , you can see that these seem to be implemented into both of them. All of these seem to also be somewhat unusual for Disney to do, especially the lack of a moral. These are really the traits that got me into TRON and TRON 2.0; they just seemed so much cooler than something Disney would do.

Traahn Wrote: It was on-par with the times for the real world gimmicky things (arcades, pac-man fever, etc.) as you say, but I was referring more to the other part: the CG worlds, a sentient program remotely taking over other computer systems, programs having a real world counterpart, the computer programmer lingo, etc. Weird stuff to a lot of people at the time... or so I hear.

Of course I agree. In many ways Tron was (vastly) ahead of it's time. But that's why I specified "trends" in my initial post. Because in terms of what the public is interested in consuming, as in marketing properly to social trends, it fell just short enough that the general audience saw it as another attempt at jumping on the pop-culture bandwagon, thus missing the fact that the film had much more to offer. A sequel runs the same risk, if it takes overly long between the writing and the distribution stages.

this is awesome news tron in 3-D awesome!

There are some great movies that would benefit from look of 3D HD. The word is getting around!

where to buy abortion pill http://blog.bitimpulse.com/template/default.aspx?abortion-types buy abortion pill online

Just a word of hope. Apple's Steve Jobs is Disney's single largest share holder, owning 6.3% of the stock valued at the time of the acquisition at $4 Billion dollars.

If he has any influence over the direction they take, then this Tron should be the most stylish and awe inspiring film from the studio to date.

I wonder if they will take a dig at Bill Gates any deeper in this version than they did with Dillinger in the original.

Speaking of...a little note of history.
When TRON's original release came out in the theatres' Apple founder Steve Wozniak took the whole company out to see it.
He told me that himself, I felt twelve all over again.