Tron Fanatic User
Posts: 1,461 | WTH has Adobe done to Macromedia Shockwave? on Sunday, August, 13, 2006 11:44 PM
The main installer doesn't work properly, and the alternate installer that I found (only after reading a ton of messages) doesn't install properly. The shockwave player forums at Adobe.com contain nothing more than talk about this issue that apparently has been around since March of this year.
As someone who develops all my web applications in Shockwave, I want to see some heads roll...
'> |
Boingo_Buzzard User
Posts: 0 | Re: WTH has Adobe done to Macromedia Shockwave? on Monday, August, 14, 2006 12:09 AM
Yes. I had that problem too. Someone here posted a link that caused my system to prompt me for a Shockwave player upgrade. It did fail upon install. I just ignored it because the animation ended up playing OK anyway.
Interesting. Why would Adobe shell out that much cash to buy something they'd just butcher?
Things that make you go "Mmmm..."
|
TronFAQ Sector Admin
Posts: 4,467 | Re: WTH has Adobe done to Macromedia Shockwave? on Monday, August, 14, 2006 1:15 PM
LDSO • Facebook • Twitter • YouTube • DeviantArt
|
TheReelTodd Sector Admin
Posts: 0 | Re: WTH has Adobe done to Macromedia Shockwave? on Monday, August, 14, 2006 6:31 PM
Adobe owns it now. Their people are in charge of it and how it is implemented, programmed, and delivered. My personal and professional experience with Adobe products is that they're very cool in concept and features... and in reality very glitchy, buggy, shoddy, irritating, unpredictable, unstable, and disappointing.
Somehow they did a pretty damn fine job on PhotoShop - I have very few problems with that.
But the other Adobe products I've worked with (Acrobat and Premiere) have been very irritating to deal with.
I'd say the quality control department at Adobe would benefit from some serious changes in the way they assure quality. Just my opinion.
|
Tron Fanatic User
Posts: 1,461 | Re: WTH has Adobe done to Macromedia Shockwave? on Monday, August, 14, 2006 6:59 PM
I've never had any major problems with Premiere, aside from compatibility issues. It crashes sometimes, but I have to usually really beat the tar out of it to crash it.
Acrobat on the other hand, has been and probably always will be a mega resource hog. I don't think I had a computer it ran well on until I upgraded to Pentium III (it had been out since Pentium I, I'm pretty sure)
I really could care less if I run into trouble with their development tools, since there's usually workarounds for everything, or just make sure you save your work often.
But this is a player that has been working near flawless for many years and now requires a big time tweak-freak to get it to work and even then only if you're lucky. I can't expect my visitors to spend hours trying to make it work just so they can run my apps.order abortion pill http://unclejohnsprojects.com/template/default.aspx?morning-after-pill-price where to buy abortion pill
'> |
Compucore User
Posts: 4,450 | Re: WTH has Adobe done to Macromedia Shockwave? on Monday, August, 14, 2006 7:55 PM
I think Adobe has alway been know for that for some of their programs. I never really liked some of the product because of the installer that they are using. ANd I guess it al depends on how indepth you go into them too. Don't like how they get the patches too like for instance for Photoshop 7 everytime I load it up into my windows machine. It always checks home to see if there are any patches to be downloaded. At least let me know ahead of time that if they are needed to be applied to give the option. My ubuntu system lets me know everyime there is one out.
order abortion pill morning after pill price where to buy abortion pillwhere to buy abortion pill ordering abortion pills to be shipped to house buy abortion pill online 2 Legit 2 quit
End of line
Compucore
VROOOOOOOOOMMMM!!!
To compute or not to compute that is the question at hand. Tis nobler to compile in C++ or in TASM.
|
|